Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

hi res pic


dadog13

Recommended Posts

Those teeth are a reflection of the inner edge of the crwon on the polished bezel. The 027A has the same case as all other 44mm models - I have a friend who has one of these.

*See the pin in the A series CG - the earlier series aren't as well made or as tight fitting as the later CGs....really no better than a Jimmy Fu CG.

Edited by PAMman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those teeth are a reflection of the inner edge of the crwon on the polished bezel. The 027A has the same case as all other 44mm models - I have a friend who has one of these.

*See the pin in the A series CG - the earlier series aren't as well made or as tight fitting as the later CGs....really no better than a Jimmy Fu CG.

OH, yeah, of course. I'm retarded. Thanks. You're right. Haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the crown guard lever has disappeared :huh:

The background of this picture has been altered in Photoshop... whoever did this, did a poor job and while cutting out the watch from its original background, deleted the CGL...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the crown guard lever has disappeared :huh:

It is a leverless self-engaging crown prototype from 1998. The CG is missing the lever and is there just for form.

They made one of these, but never went into a production, since Paneristi didn't like it - LOL!

...sorry :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Antiquorum do this very frequently... I really like to have a close-up look at the complicated watches because their beauty is just as visible under a microscope as it is from far away.

I was always wondering, though, if these are real photographs or just computerized drawings... they seem so "perfect" in the pictures that its hard to believe somebody actually shot that with a camera...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Teeth on the case? You guys are killing me. :laugh:

:lol: ...but I have never noticed that before while looking at pics of PAMs...strange!

well, just to add one more pic of a PR dial (this is a rare dial // seems it is a prototype dial) :

prpamnc8.jpg

prototypeprdialdo3.jpg

Wonder why the rep makers never did a good version of the 027/028 with the asian movement (I know that there are reps of them with asian movements - but they are poorly done IMO)...

Edited by dadog13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, just to add one more pic of a PR dial (this is a rare dial // seems it is a prototype dial) :

Yes, a prototype, and a very early one too.

Oddly, a next-step prototype (028 too) is what is displayed as 027 and 028 reference pics on some sites also including the ViaPaneristi site:

http://poodpood.spymac.com/officinepanerai/

http://poodpood.spymac.com/officinepanerai/target20.html

http://poodpood.spymac.com/officinepanerai/target21.html

http://www.viapaneristi.com/pammodels.htm

http://www.viapaneristi.com/pammodelsrefer...amhtm/pam28.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just reading an italian watch magazine last night...from the 1998...the price of these (027 & 028) was 4.600.000 lit (lire italiane)...that would be today something as 2.300
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly.

And on current auctions they usually go @ about 11000-12000 USD. :blink:

Even a small thing when compared to a 127 or, especially, a 203. :wub:

I think I've read somewhere that the prices of the 028 are higher than that..they really rarely appear on the 2nd hand market...

from all the pannies, the two I'd love to have are the 028 and the 203...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I've read somewhere that the prices of the 028 are higher than that..they really rarely appear on the 2nd hand market...

Good to know. I was remembering prices of 1+ years ago, they have probably grown up now. And the USD is weaker.

from all the pannies, the two I'd love to have are the 028 and the 203...

We have a lot of things in commons, dadog! :)

Even if the 104, 147 and 212 are not so bad to me too. B)

Not to speak about the 233, 236, 270, 274... :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up