vlydog Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 1) Are the SELs on a 93250 bracelet specific to one particular Rolex model? I had a potential seller tell me that they would only fit a Sea dweller. 2) Is there a reference site that charts all the models and there bracelet partners? 3) Has anyone had trouble attaching a 93250 to a WM9 16610? Thank you, vlydog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 The 93250 is the bracelet for the 16610 Submariner. It replaced the 93150 (with 501 B endpieces) in the early 2000's before lugholes disappeared. Lugholes went away around 2004. Sometime in the last couple of years, they stopped marking the bracelet. Various 93250's can be tough to attach to various Subs due to the location of the springbar holes on the case which varies from watch to watch- noob, CN, WM9, euro/MBW, etc. http://www.14270.com/spec-rolex.htm lists bracelets, but there are errors. The bracelet for the late SD is 93260, earlier ones were 93160- both w/ attached end pieces. 1665 SD took a 9315/93150 with 285/580/585 endpieces. As is the case with Rolex, variations do occur. Another site is http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/exs...aceletchart.jpg Once again there are errors, but it is a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray T Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 hmm i have 93160a stamped on my clasp, and my sd is a m serial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 Yeh, I'm probably dreaming up the 93260- the photobucket chart says 93160 w/ 592B SEL's. SD's aren't my strong suite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosnik Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 93250 it's for Submariner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cht Posted November 13, 2008 Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 (edited) The late A series was when the first SEL 93250 came out on the sub. Some great info! I've been trying to find info on this too so this helps! On the charts, I'm not seeing the 455b? So what were they from? Or are these just rep pieces? How far back (year wise) did the hollow mid links go back on the 91350's? Edited November 13, 2008 by cht Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlydog Posted November 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 Thank you for all the great information gang. Can any one answer number 3? 3) Has anyone had trouble attaching a 93250 to a WM9 16610? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotis Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Thank you for all the great information gang. Can any one answer number 3?3) Has anyone had trouble attaching a 93250 to a WM9 16610? Did you ever find out? know its an old thread but I could use the info right about now cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
correctime Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 For what it's worth I attempted fitting a gen 93250 SEL to a WM9 v3 a couple years back and it didn't fit....too tight. At that time I wasn't willing to shave the insides of the lugs on a v3 case and I certainly wasn't willing to shave the gen SEL. This is just from my experience....well all know the slight variations and inconsistencies in dimensions that are common with rep/aftermarket parts. ................so it's a gamble....but it didn't work for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonyyammine Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 I have my gen 93250 on my bk. its ok but a tc v3 fits perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
correctime Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 I have my gen 93250 on my bk. its ok but a tc v3 fits perfectly. on your BK what Brother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonyyammine Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) Sorry my bk sub the last one he had.not the tc he was selling. Edited November 9, 2013 by Tonyyammine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotis Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 so it can go either way no one wants to gamble with such an expensive braclet, the watch I got is a WM9 16610 z series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now