priebe Posted July 19, 2006 Report Posted July 19, 2006 (edited) PAM253 1950 Flyback Regatta as Rep ? Hi All, What do you think about that if you can buy that ??? priebe Edited July 20, 2006 by priebe
Guest overboosted Posted July 19, 2006 Report Posted July 19, 2006 what do you mean by what do you mean?
dadog13 Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 what do you mean by what do you mean? he means, what do you mean?...
priebe Posted July 20, 2006 Author Report Posted July 20, 2006 he means, what do you mean?... thanks priebe
Mano74 Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 You mean it would be nice ? or do you mean it would be Very nice !
kanerich Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 PAM253 1950 Flyback Regatta as Rep ? Hi All, What do you think about that if you can buy that ??? priebe I'm guess soon I could buy it if I was so inclined, since it seems pretty straightforward to rep. I doubt I personally would since I already have the very, very similar 212 but it's very nice.
Quarks Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 You mean it would be nice ? or do you mean it would be Very nice ! Do you mean it would be VERY nice or do you mean it to be very NICE?
swdivad Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 I mean I would sell my 212 for this one in a heartbeat... I mean it!
dadog13 Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 well, i like it...i had the 212 and i sold it and i miss it...one day i'll get it again...tht is for sure....if this will come out untill then...i'll get it...just one question...is it 40mm or 44mm?
jimmytim Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 Yes, I would give-up one hour of work to get this if available. But no, I don't really know if that is what you mean....
dcrooz Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 Do you mean it would be VERY nice or do you mean it to be very NICE? You guys crack me up!
AMK000 Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 You all mean what I think you mean or you mean something different. Seriously now , other thansome specific panerai models which are trully different (188,193, gmt , etc...) some are pretty much the same watch. Marketing tecnique to introduce a new model which is basically an old one with some "face lifting". ......... but I guess not everybody shares the same opinion.
trustywatchguy Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 (edited) CODE: noosereheblliwti Decipher it yourself... Cheers ANDREW Edited July 20, 2006 by trustywatchguy
fletch512 Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 (edited) Nice watch. I'd buy this if a good copy came out. I'd buy the 212, but I can't get past the incorrect seconds markings. Of course if history is any indication, when this watch goes to production, they factory will find a way to insert an obvious flaw. Edited July 20, 2006 by fletch512
docblackrock Posted July 20, 2006 Report Posted July 20, 2006 Sorry to be grouchy but for god's sake!!! Quarks posted an almost identical thread HERE...about six weeks ago Anyway, my POV hasn't changed... Not my cup of tea at all sorry :yucky: Like the inbred bastard love-child of a 212 and 192
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now