Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Watchmaker may have goofed...but did I win?


Justasgood

Recommended Posts

I ordered a Twin lock crown and tube for my vintage 5512. I have a 702 crown but gave up trying to find a tube. So I thought I would try to source a 700(original to the 5512/5513 of the early 60's) crown and tube to replace the modern 703 set.

When I picked up the parts, my watchmaker handed me a tube and crown but the package of the tube reads 24-7000. ( the crown was loose and un packaged although new).

Any idea what I have?

Is this correct for the early 60's 5512/5513's?

Thanks in advance,

Kurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if the watch is gen-powered (1520/1570), then I would certainly consider it.

Even for a gen caliber based frankenwatch, I would not use a NOS pair like what K has. If I had a used 24-7000 tube in good shape, I'd consider using that paired with a new 700 crown, but a tube NOS in the pack is simply worth too much to use for a franken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mostly agree with Ubi, assuming the project watch is ETA-powered. But if the watch is gen-powered (1520/1570), then I would certainly consider it. I have a couple that I plan to use on my gen-powered 5514 & 1665 when I do the next overhaul.

If anyone is interested, moelarrycu has 1 for sale right now.

Thanks Freddy. I would only use it on my 5512....(remember the TZ post) ;)

However, I wear the snot out of it and if the value of the twin lock is as high as a couple $100, I would just as soon stick with the Triplock 24-703.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say this, but I think you may have a brand new aftermarket Twinlock.

The gen should have striations around the bottom edge of the crown as you see here

Crown looks okay to me. These old crowns had a top layer of thick foil wrapping the actual crown. Those are the striations that you see- The foil where it is pressed and 'sealed' to the crown. Underneath is a solid SS crown complete with the coronet, etc.

I know this to be 100% the case as I had coaxed ziggy into unwrapping one of his some time back a few years ago, mostly to see what was underneath. Thankfully, 24-700 crowns are easier to find than the tubes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crown looks okay to me. These old crowns had a top layer of thick foil wrapping the actual crown. Those are the striations that you see- The foil where it is pressed and 'sealed' to the crown. Underneath is a solid SS crown complete with the coronet, etc.

I know this to be 100% the case as I had coaxed The Zigmeister into unwrapping one of his some time back a few years ago, mostly to see what was underneath. Thankfully, 24-700 crowns are easier to find than the tubes.

It is definately a foil wrap and I also have seen a TZ member unwrap a few for the heck of it.

I feel comfortable in my watchmaker's assesment but I will entertain all expert opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up