Leaderboard

6263 Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-A520F met Tapatalk

Just to add my two Cents. How they are different from Noob, well they are massively overpriced and they are blatantly lying about their product. Pretty much nothing is accurate down to the nanometre, certainly not watches, manufacturing tolerances on genuine Rolex will be bigger than that. They ain’t made in Switzerland, that is a lie, I bet they are just overpriced Chinese fakes, but guarantee they aren’t Swiss. Experts can’t tell them from genuine. The only blind watchmaker I know about, was a book by Richard Dawkins. Only you can decide how much you are comfortable spending on fake watches, or even how much on one watch. However paying $1250 for a watch that I doubt is worth $500 and from a company that blatantly lies on it’s website doesn’t seem a great deal to me. Welcome to our community, as Mike says, stick around and read a few threads and don’t get scammed.

Frankenjust Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk

It is the Le Bron James model my friend. Love the color scheme. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[emoji41] Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

As above, but also remember modern depth ratings are not really relevant. Anything beyond 50 metres and you are into professional diving, with professional diving gear, not some lame ass rep or even a genuine Rolex these days. Nobody uses a dive watch instead of a modern dive computer, nobody times motorsport on a Daytona, and pilots don’t rely on pilot watches. I have a watch rated for 2500 metres, which would only really be useful for working out how long I’ve been dead.

Love it!!!

The replica daytonas with full working chronos are too thick, and the movement used in them is a lot less reliable. The ARF ones have chronos that work partially (up to 60 seconds), and the correct thickness, or at least one which is much closer vs gen. The movement, though not as reliable as say, the A2824 or 2836, is still more reliable than the modified A7750 sec@6 with full working chrono. I agree with @themannier though, the non working chronos are not issues at all. Let's face it, chronograph functions on watches these days are 99% unused and serve more as decoration, adding complication to the dial. I hardly even touch the chronos on my gen daytonas. In this hobby, it is often that we make decisions about what we can live with, and what we cannot. For me personally I will rather have the correct thickness, a more reliable movement, and I can live without working chronograph. You have to make your own decision about your preference though.