I just thought i would resurect this old thread to highlight the fact that we have been waiting for ever for a decent MK XV and XVI rep, come on makers these are soo simple for you to make well, just do it!
version 1 from J and A, has a chopped in half lume dot @ 3 Also sizes listed originaly By J and A were a mm to small but not seen any one who has mesured it to confim if it is too small of just bad mesuring by J and A.
Version 2 first shown by Angus but now also on J and A has the correct smaller but round lume dot @ 3 but currently and being listed as a sample has 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, 70, 80, 90 printed on the rehaeut ring.
Appologys if it was posted before, i dont spend a lot of time in this area
hxxp://www.breitlingsource.com/articles_replica_goodones.shtml
a good but basic list to look out for
Pugwash found the clip i used after i asked the same question, then i just uploaded it to photobucket, be aware it pushed my bandwith use into the pro area and i had to subscribe to use it!
All the information you need you will find under the search button, but think first, what you consider to be a good rep maybe different than others, if you use the collectors from the forum there no chance you will get ripped off, but there is a saying "first chose your dealer, than you watch", reaserch who you would like to deal with! the other question is what pam are you looking for, there are soooo many. Also as a supporter you will have acces to more infromation and sections of the forum.
I think you will be happy with that speedmaster, that realy is a work horse. Even though it is not a hacking movement (the seconds cant be stopped by pulling the crown) mine runns to with in plus 2 seconds a day!!
It is raining here today but here is one from a few years ago with my well crap but hard working thin case SD, i hope to be back on the water in a couple of weeks.
You will strugle to get a good choice of reps that are of a good quality in quartz, i know that Narikaa ofteren has a few though. I personaly dont tlike the idea of a quartz movement in a watch that should be auto/mechanical, I dont think i wouls buy another quartz gen, i just like the mechanics, An a point of reliability, the asian 21j has proved its self over many years (yes there have been failiers) i was wearing a seadweller yesterday that i bought in 2004, as soon as i pick it up it starts ticking away with out a problem, and i have ABUSED this watch, ETAs can give problems and if you read into to the gen forums they can be just a problematic.