greg_r

Fair enough - thanks for stopping by

hmm... I assume you've come across Firefly? Didn't last long, but what there was is good. Another (albeit old) short-lived series that I love is Profit. It's not like anything else I've seen - certainly not action, but it's exceptionally well written black comedy and quite gripping in an odd sort of way...

Looks great, John.

As has been mentioned elsewhere.. http://www.jpc8118.com/

Ewwwwww......

hmm - maybe I should reconsider my last reply...

Not last time I checked, no.

I'm laughing so hard can barely type....

Cool - I'm sure you're right.

That'll surprise the hell outta my wife......

Miffed me more than a bit too. The RWG1: prefix serves a useful purpose. I'm sure we all contribute to other threads here too, but our 'bin threads are a way to keep our community together until 'home' rises from the ashes. That prefix isn't intended to exclude others, but it does serve as a warning that the thread will probably not stay on topic and is likely to include all sorts of unrelated nonsense. Anyhow, I've re-titled all of my threads now. Hopefully, they'll stay that way. I've adminned/moderated all sorts of forums, mailing lists and IRC channels over the years, and that kinda pettiness definitely qualifies as misuse of mod privileges in my book.

ummm ooookay. Thanks for that. I think.

Cool

hahaha - that's a far more difficult question to answer than you might imagine, Pug Seriously, Dems - it's good to see you here. I've missed your eloquence and wit. (sorry if that sounded gay )

Yep - that's my take on it too. Admin's a good guy. Yep - I'm already there - doing it right now.

I don't know whether you've noticed this, John, but all our previously-labeled RWG1: threads have had RWG1 removed from the thread title. I know FOR A FACT that I've labeled all of my topics that way. Kinda petty for a mod to go in and change 'em. Not impressed. If it happens again, my platinum subscription will cease forthwith. On a happier note, Hi Dems! Good to see you!

[censored] yeah! LMAO

Yep - kinda like that myself. Reminiscent of the Flying B in a funny kinda way... These two also took my fancy today: http://www.cqout.com/item.asp?id=4334655 http://www.cqout.com/item.asp?id=4338434

"There is time to laugh and there is a time not to laugh, and this is not one of them."

hmm - I'm not planning to do it right away, and haven't really checked out what they're going for lately. If I don't manage to talk myself out of it in the meantime, however, I'll letcha know as and when, okay?

Same cases, bracelets for sure. Same dial, however, is rare - the cheaper version will generally lack lume and, if we're talking about chronos, will normally be completely different due to the subdial spacing requirements of the cheaper movement. All the same, it's true that the cheapies are getting better.

None of the 'Daylight' models have a cyclops. Take a look at the GMT models (029, 063, 089, 156 amongst others...). By the way, a white date wheel is inaccurate - should be black.

"What do we know... ONE.. That the professor and his daughter have been kidnapped TWO... That someone has kid-nap-ped them and THREE..... MY HAND IS ON FIRE!!! "

Not so interesting, I'm afraid - standard scammer fare, just better presented than most.