Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

ubiquitous

Platinum Member
  • Posts

    13,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

Posts posted by ubiquitous

  1. Well, in the case of $800 modded Subs becoming obsolete in a few months time.. There is no fun in that. At all.

    I suppose we're all in this hobby for different reasons. But I must say that the work I do on my watches isn't by any means special, nor is it difficult. It's certainly not rocket science, and I do believe that with the right tools, patience, mind set and a good eye for detail (as many of the members have- Quite possibly the most scrutinizing eyes of any WIS forum) most people can do this exterior modification work (not to be confused with movement work and overhauls that Ziggy performs, which DOES require skill, talent, knowledge and expertise). It does take practice, but we all gotta start somewhere. I wish more members would give it a try...

    Anyhow... I think I must have somehow siderailed this discussion from the original topic to a debate on mods :) I'm going to sit back for a bit, enjoy my Excedrin and Mountain Dew cocktail and try to zone out for a bit.

  2. I am among those who believes that if you want the best, sometimes you have to build it. And if you have to build it, start with the best platform to do it. MBW's offer just that. A good basis to start with. Sure, you have to swap out a considerable amount of items, but let's face it- replica parts just look like... Replica parts. Want it to look like genuine? Use genuine parts. It ain't cheap, and sometimes finding such parts is not easy, but the results speak for themselves. Sure... It's still a fake. Sure, it's expensive. But, it's a hobby, and hobbies are never cheap. I'm picky... And I've been called picky. Doesn't bother me... It's just the truth. I like my stuff to look as high quality as possible, and I take pride in the fact that my watches are a direct result of the time and effort invested :)

    If I wanted gen, I'd buy gen. But where's the fun in that? I'd buy it, wear it, and eventually get bored with it. If I build something, it's given me an opportunity to do more with my watch...

  3. 2.5mm and 3.0mm is indicative of the size of the hole for the threads on the tube and pushers. 5.3mm and 6.0mm is indicative of the size of crown that is compatible with said tubes.

    For the crown tube, the '6.0mm' tap in that auction should work just fine (tubes for 6mm and 7mm crowns have the same size threaded bodies). Not sure about the tube for the 5.3mm crown, but that one just might carry the 2.5mm diameter, as that's the one used in ladies' size watches...

  4. Indicies look okay to me. I've seen markers like that on some legit 6263's. At first glance, they did look a little wide... But I think it might have been my eyes playing tricks on me; the angled portions of the markers are kind of masked by the shadow and lack of light which gives them a shorter, wider appearance.

  5. As the original poster, I'll play along too...

    1) My franken 16520 Daytona with El Primero 400. At the top of my list for accuracy in both aesthetics and function, and easily one of my favorite watches I've put together. As close to genuine as you can get without buying the real deal.

    92533-27967.jpg

    2) My DW 6263. My 2nd favorite for accuracy and aesthetics; currently getting some heart surgery :) Some nice genuine parts fitted, and very close to genuine.

    92533-27968.jpg

    3) My MBW 1665. My 3rd favorite, and one of my favorite daily beaters. Simple, durable, a glutton for punishment and fitted with a ton of genuine parts.

    92533-27969.jpg

  6. I did find it interesting, however, that he lists the dial as intended for a 6238 Pre-Daytona and a 6241; both of which were Non-Oyster models with pump pushers and Twinlocks. That being the case, I'd think that this Oyster signed dial would be more fitting for a 6263/5...

  7. Difficult to say, really. Authentications must be done using a loupe to inspect the printing as well as the lume for the tell tale indications of age to really authenticate as original. To my eye, the dial looks good, all the fonts line up with where they're supposed to, except the the T SWISS T, which seems a little squished between the minute track and the 6:00 subdial. I have, however, seen a few examples where this is also evident on some genuine watches owned by well educated collectors, so this is probably not an issue. The coronet looks legit, and overall the dial looks correct.

  8. For those of you unfamiliar with MBW's...

    How to identify a vintage MBW 1680 and 1665.

    Original post is here....

    With all the talk of MBW's vintage Rolex models, I thought I'd do a small little write up on two popular models (the 1680 and 1665) to outline a few key tell-all characteristics on how to identify a genuine MBW from the others.

    Starting with an MBW 1680 Red Submariner:

    92495-27977.jpg

    Here are the first key characterisctics- s/n L341455:

    92495-27978.jpg

    92495-27979.jpg

    And the Ref. number. Note the purposely mispelled 'POLEX':

    92495-27980.jpg

    92495-27981.jpg

    Now we move on to the actual construction of the bezel assembly. The MBW's bezels are put together just like genuine:

    *Retaining ring

    *Bezel washer

    *Bezel ring

    *Bezel insert

    92495-27982.jpg

    Retaining ring, which holds the crystal down, and keeps things water tight via a gasket underneath the seated lip:

    92495-27983.jpg

    The bezel washer, which allows the bezel ring to rotate bi-directionally, but allows enough tension to keep the bezel ring to spin freely:

    92495-27984.jpg

    The bezel ring itself:

    92495-27985.jpg

    And the bezel insert installed (in this case, a genuine insert):

    92495-27986.jpg

    And, of course, one other characteristic- Genuine Rolex parts fit, no muss, no fuss.

    Genuine Tropic127:

    92495-27987.jpg

    And, as mentioned above, the genuine vintage inserts simply snap right in :lol:

    92495-27988.jpg

    92495-27989.jpg

    And now the 1665 White Sea-Dweller:

    92495-27990.jpg

    The s/n- 5790134 (The DRSD uses s/n 5790358):

    92495-27991.jpg

    92495-27992.jpg

    This time, the Ref is simply stamped 'REGISTERED DESIGN':

    92495-27993.jpg

    92495-27994.jpg

    Bezel assembly is the same as the MBW 1680 and Genuine, except the profile is stepped, and not flat like the 1680's:

    *Retaining ring

    *Bezel washer

    *Bezel ring

    *Bezel insert

    92495-27995.jpg

    Profile is stepped, and thicker. Like the 1680, the retaining ring has a gasket under the seated base:

    92495-27996.jpg

    Bezel washer:

    92495-27997.jpg

    Bezel ring. Much thicker than the Sub (same profile as genuine):

    92495-27998.jpg

    Genuine insert snapped in:

    92495-27999.jpg

    Genuine Tropic39 installed (non-superdome):

    92495-28000.jpg

    Genuine crown/tube and springbars:

    92495-28001.jpg

    92495-28002.jpg

    92495-28003.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up