Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Akira

Member
  • Posts

    803
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Akira

  1. Should I use the FAT Font insert which would be more correct for the year of the case?

    -or-

    Should I stay with my "Service" theme and use the NOS Service Thinner Font Insert?

    Very nice build mate,

    about your Q.

    Depending on what you want your watch to be.

    Really well taken care off? Only worn a couple of times over the years? Then I'd say fat front...it's in remarkable shape.

    I it recently serviced, plexi exchanged, service dial, service insert!

    Since yours has a service dial, I'd say thin front insert :D

    • Like 1
  2. you starteded it - but i openly admit im not an Rolexaddict fanboy with closed eyes and empty pockets like you :1:

    Careful Frank.

    You are implying something, you actually have no evidence of.

    You have no idea how much Andygt or I have paid for our builds.

    You don't know the price of Zeleni's either.

    I think it's best we keep concentrating on the facts we are all aware of.

  3. Another shallow cut like mine. At this point the WSO bezel is not an issue IMHO.

    Like I said before, the WSO bezel is a gen style bezel.

    The question is, if it fits historically to your dial and case.

    The shallow cut bezel would never be seen on a PCG gilt chapter dial, except for a replacement bezel.

    That's all I wanted to point out with my post :D

  4. why didnt you take one with the minute ring ? whould this be more correct ?

    Not more correct, but a different production model.

    The gilt dial 1675 without "chapter ring exclamation" is a rare piece.

    I've seen it PCG and square

    With small GMT hand as well as normal

    All 1960-1965

    4800972_large2.jpg+

    PICT0007_2.JPG

    8.jpg

  5. Are Yuki Dial and Gen different diameter, I have a Gen Dial That I trying to install on a Josh's 1655 case bit is a little bit too small maybe half of a milimiter or one. I do not want to cut the feet fo the Dial and ruining it if this will not work.

    Anybody is having the same issue,

    Yuki and gen dial should have the same diameter....

    I'd say you have had bad luck with your case maybe?

    One of a kind faulty rehaut?

  6. Much obliged RA & Scope

    Naturally, since l only had this bezel to try out the technique, the finish could be a little bit better.

    The post was more ment to be a guide for those with actual skills and tools like RA, Scope and Andy as well as Donerix :D

    I'm just a kid who likes to experiment ;)

  7. Well done.The bezel has always been the biggest issue for me when it comes to GMT builds. I once tired doing the same with a bezel but my result wasn't even close...

    I wish FxrAndy would make some, I am sure he would make a lot of people happy ... because I have ordered several supposedly gen-like bezel assemblies fro different suppliers and they are all just slightly different submariner bezels.

    NIce job

    Thanks for the kind words.

    The thing is, I'm always unafraid to mod my own watches...I broke a few tho' :lol:

    I have done small modding jobs in the past for RWG friends, but I'd never take any money for it....

    However I can't cover if anything goes wrong either.

    Little difficult, but modding those supposed to be "gen-like" bezel to match your dial and case is possible.

  8. Only issue I see is not the bezel, but the insert. It needs to be pushed into the bezel more in some places. That to me is a much bigger issue.

    I took the insert off for modding the bezel and just put it back in for the pics.

    I didn't push it in hard enough obviously...it sits flush and thight now :)

    @Andy

    I had a dremel as well, but it's pretty hard to work exact with it.

    Using a jewelers file, having the right shape is easier and more exact.

  9. So what had I learned?

    I wanted my watch to simulate a 1969 MKI 2.4 Million Serial

    The bezel I got had kinda flat cuts, which weren't deep enough to actually be from 1969.

    They looked more like the ones from 1978 or later.

    Moreover the cuts were uneven, some deeper, some flatter.

    eeb2ddb7.jpg

    2bf83b27.jpg

    So I started to plan the recut:

    494f72c1.jpg

    1ffaf386.jpg

    I used a goldsmith's file and the hand polishing machine. (I'm related to a goldsmith)

    This is the final result:

    DSC08759.jpg

    DSC08761.jpg

    DSC08750.jpg

    DSC08751.jpg

    DSC08756.jpg

    DSC08757.jpg

    DSC08758.jpg

    I hope you too think this is an improvement :)

    Please share your thoughts and feedback

    Cheers

    Akira

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up