PPN

Nice to see an old post like this revived. It's always been one of my keepers..

Where can I find one of these?

I have both a 288 and 214 from angus. They are exactetly the same quality. The only differance is I like the face of the 214 more. Because the 214 has an open back and obvious the mechanism is vissable it is not so much loved. If I would consider selling one it woild be the 288

Thanks for replying, lomberto. I tend to agree - I like the dial of the 214 a little more as well.

But is it true that the split second function on the 214 rep is non-functional? The button at the 7 position is only cosmetic?

I was just reading some great reviews of this watch on this forum. A great watch, and probably one of the best reps I've seen. But something about it always bothered me. I noticed that on the rep versions there are hour markers at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 positions, and that the subdials do not quite reach the edges. Like in the first attachment.

But from the Omega website, I noticed that the genuine version has the subdials at 12 and 6 extending further out and that there are no hour markers at the 12, 3, 6 or 9 positions. Am I missing something here or was there a previous gen version of the Seamaster chrono that the rep is based on?

the 7753 would be an auto movement where this watch requires a manual one

the seagull is a manual wind but does not have a correct funtioning 12hour counter dial and also the sub dials are a little too far out resulting in short 3 and 9 markers

Omega 321

seagull

Thanks, Andy. So do I understand correctly that there is currently no completely accurate rep of the moonwatch (the best one still has short 3/6/9 markers)?

Beautiful. I want one one of these "super reps", but they seem to be out of stock everywhere!

Anyone know where I can get one of these Speedies? Especially one in a more traditional black dial, 3210.50?

Nope, not yet...

Seagull is the best way to go.

Sorry, newbie here. Can you be more specific on what you mean? What exactly is the Seagull movement, and where does it fall short?

I'm struggling with the PO purchase now. Actually, I've purchased a couple of POs previously, which turned out to be bad reps. But then I found this forum, and I now know better. ;-)

But then I also noticed that Omega will soon be releasing a new version of the PO. As a matter of fact, it's already on their website. Ceramic bezel, squarer hour markers at 3/6/9, He moved to 10 position, etc.

Does anyone know any seller is planning on repping the new PO? If so, should I wait for that, or should I pull the trigger on the current PO?

One of the best divers out there, enjoy!

Very nice. So is the power reserve sub-dial functional?

Congrats! Looking good.

Haven't seen the casebacks yet, but the crownguard pin seem to be the only thing that's slightly different to me.

Thanks for the pics!

Beautiful pictures, lovely collection.

Excellent spreadsheet. I know this must have taken you some time, thanks so much for sharing it with us.

Never been repped. 288 is close and one of the best Pam reps.

Really? I'm relatively new to this, but I see reps of this all around - including from reliable guys like Josh. Is that one not a good rep?

Anyone else notice differences in the lugs as well? Seems that the gen has thicker lugs (like the GMTIIc) whereas the rep seems to have slightly more tapered ones.

What an excellent and informative thread. I'm glad it's a sticky.

Hey guys, been reading this forum quite a bit, but first time post. Lots of great stuff here!

Does anyone know if an accurate version of the PAM00214 Radiomir is out? Or does anyone have one that could share their thoughts? Where could I find one?

Thanks in advance.