Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

By-Tor

Diamond Member
  • Posts

    10,472
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by By-Tor

  1. Hi Karen,

    I have never heard of a dealer called "lvmonia". Our members generally don't deal with cqout, Ioffer and other such places. Why? Looks like your case is yet another example.

    I'm afraid you've been taken. The only thing that might make you feel better is that the watch would probably have been a POS anyway.

    But no worries, all the dealers in the RWG Link Section are proven, well known and trustworthy. You'll find much better replica from any of those dealers.

    Happy hunting, and welcome to the forum!

  2. I have always traded all my watches that don't get wrist time. I have owned about 40-45, but I haven't regretted even one trade afterwards. Now I have only 7 reps, all getting constant wrist rotation... and I have to say I enjoy my watches a lot more this way.

    Actually I haven't bought a new rep since December 2007 (except upgraded my GMT 16710 to a chs model). I want a Ebel BTR though... thanks to Lani's and Taka's pictures.

    But I understand the different approach perfectly. That's the "collectors point of view". Some reps I've traded have been superb replications, some probably can never be found again (when they'll be gone off the production line). But then again I'm not a collector type of person. If the watch can't capture my heart, it'll go. Usually I know after 2 months. :)

  3. I've never been a vintage Rolex person, really. But I owned this MBW a few years ago. I was going to make a lot of mods, but never got into it...

    7.jpg

    Watches from my Great Grandfather and Grandfather. Not Rolexes though... the pocket watch with Breguet coil was a gift from the French Embassy.

    IMG_4491.jpg

    IMG_4490.jpg

    The other watch is a Swiss gold watch "Choisi", bought from a Russian offcer during the WW2.

    This brand still exists, and I was in contact with the management director. They wanted to photograph the watch for their archives, but I took the shots for them.

    IMG_1102.jpg

    IMG_1100.jpg

  4. The two-tone MBK Sub and "Noob" Sub definitely have "solid" links. The gold is not going to wear off, as the middle links are "full" gold. The actual carat might be very low and the copper content very high... but it's not going to wear off like plating. The middle links are definitely polishable (I've tested it myself). Whatever gold it is... ("trumpet " gold, low carat gold, etc.) it looks quite good on the watches I reviewed.

    http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=70871

    The gold issue has been beaten to death over the years. There's a lot in the archives.

    web_tt-14k-test1646.jpg

  5. It's a beauty. Congrats!

    Yes, the Noob dial is better but I still wouldn't bother swapping it in (except if you already have a spare and can do it yourself). WM9 dial is ok. The cg's need some work... just straighten the insides and you have heck of a nice Sub.

    PS: The SELs don't seem to fit that well. But maybe it's just the picture?

  6. Why would rolex polish some and not others? Since the model numbers aren't different how would they differentiate which one you get?

    I don't know. Perhaps for the same reason they have 5 different dial variations of the Yacht-Master Rolesium. Lots of YM's have different coronet position... and many, many variations on the "YACHT-MASTER" font boldness. Also SWISSMADE and SWISS ' MADE are constantly different, no logic there.

    And for the same reason they put out GMT 16710 dials with "GMT MASTER II" and "GMT MASTER ||" fonts. Or have 2 different color font variations on the 16613 bezel, plain yellow and brown/gold.

    Trust me, they come both ways.

    Here's a 2006 model. Only the clasp edges are polished. Pic from Uhrenfan.de:

    rashuchjs7.jpg

    Here's another new one from Bernardwatch:

    http://www.bernardwatch.com/watch/RLX3627

  7. @Dude: No, definitely not. That watch isn't bad, but it has one fundamental flaw, which is the datewheel/cyclops positioned too right. It's very typical problem with Submariner/GMT reps. It also has pure stainless steel showing underneath the sides of the gold wrapped SEL.

    I think I owned that exact same watch 3 years ago (from Joshua himself). Nice rep, but can't be compared to either of these (in any way).

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up