Actually, one of the undercurrents of this thread, indeed about all discussion regarding religion, is the universality of certain beliefs.
This is why, to people of small intellect, certain religious stories (or myths in their view) have the exact same attributes, convincing them that one religion is just a "rip off" of another.
For example, Mariolatory is nothing new under the Sun. The veneration of the Virgin Mary follows the tradition of many belief-systems in history, where a woman is held as model-absolute to all. Hera was a Mother Goddess, so was Isis, so was Kwan Yin, Lakshmi, etc. etc. etc.
Buddha is also believed to be a product of parthenogenesis, that is, the product of a mother's non-sexual intercourse.
(If you leave it to the geniuses at Zeitgeist, they'll make the argument that Buddha and Jesus are the same person...)
What does this mean? That humans have a primordial need to explain their human story in much the same way. We clearly also need to believe in SOMETHING.
And then tear it down.