I think the worst case scenario for her is that she was being genuine. Because first of all, and obviously, America doesn't need an emotionally unstable president at this juncture - or at any juncture for that matter. Second of all, if she was in fact being genuine then I find it extremely problematic because of WHY she was getting teary eyed. She wasn't weeping over the state of health care, the fact that more and more Americans are subject to AMT, homelessness, etc, etc. She was crying because she lost in Iowa and is poised to lose in New Hampshire today when not too long ago she was the presumptive nominee. So if she was being genuine, then she's showing a true lack of resiliency. And if the campaign trail is more than she can handle, then she certainly doesn't belong in the oval office.
Luckily, though, I'm quite certain she was acting, if you can call it that. We can judge a persons true character and personality by how they behave when NOT in public or on camera. And the clear picture we have of Hillary is one of an automaton witch that you do NOT cross: http://www.thatpoliticalblog.com/serendipi...ucked!.html Does that really look like a soft, weepy woman?