redwatch Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Check out this one. 7928/0 - apparently original owner. Watch head only. Can be found here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 That is alot of money for a franken (at best) or rep (at worst). That auction contains all the hallmarks of a scam (no good clear pics, no bracelet, no movement pic, no returns, etc). My sympathies to the buyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris5264 Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 I can't believe it got that much.......bank wire,,,no returns,,,no decent pics..........someone paid almost 2,000 (usd) for who knows what???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HaloArchive Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 "Payment will be only Bank Wire Transfer. No other payment accepted. No returns. Thanks" Ouch. Scamola. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pre V Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 Looks like a Moolaish Tudor. Certainly cannot affirm to the authenticity by such poor taken pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakemaster Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 2k. Totally awesome. Really picked up at the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 The buyer has zero feedback. I wonder if the seller is being scammed and this baby will be back on the market in a few days. The other bidders look legit, even if they are gamblers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwatch Posted July 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 Yeah, the "no return" policy with crappy photos is what really got me. Nice story though! He certainly seemed to spend quite a bit of time crafting that one! This was my favorite line of the whole auction: "I have just been informed by generous and informed collector that this Tudor may not have a cal 390 movement, rather it could be an eta. I have no knowledge of these ins and outs of movements and the historical relationship between Rolex and Tudor. I want to disclose this information to all of you who are interested in this watch so you can make your best decision regarding this auction. I have told my story in the above revisions and I stand by it. However, as my listing states there are no returns, so please be aware of all the possibilities regarding the movement issue. Thanks alot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member X Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 Is that alarm bells I hear ringing? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now