dovo1695 Posted February 1, 2010 Report Posted February 1, 2010 Whilst searching for an inexpensive watch winder, I came across this interesting website. It won't win any style competitions, but for the money I think it's a pretty good effort. Will a watch winder such as this that moves along a single plane (rather than "fuzzy logic" multi-plane movements)do the job? If so, I might give it a try. EDIT: Posted this before I had my morning coffee. The link is now below http://showcase.netins.net/web/patrickd/winder/Homemade%20Watch%20Winder.html
plaifender Posted February 1, 2010 Report Posted February 1, 2010 very interesting indeed... haha give us the link!
dovo1695 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Report Posted February 1, 2010 I like this one even better. It's listed maximum weight is 1.8 pounds. It wouldn't be tough to build 2-3 foam lined oak trays that could accomodate 6-8 watches each. Now you've got yourself a 24 watch winder for <$300. Seems like it would work pretty well. Any thoughts? http://tcssci.com/nutator/index.htm
valerian Posted February 1, 2010 Report Posted February 1, 2010 I prefer this model: Seriously though, the first model (diy) is quite creative. Although the second tool seems to be quite a charming little machine, isn't that too busy for your movements? Val.
Jkay Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Will a watch winder such as this that moves along a single plane (rather than "fuzzy logic" multi-plane movements)do the job? Of course. All that needs to happen is moving the watch's rotor. Anything else is just an excuse to charge you more for no reason. A watch pulses billions and billions of times in it's life with hardly any wear. A winder salesman would have you believe that it needs to be wound randomly or ... SOMETHING TERRIBLE WILL HAPPEN. If your watch needs to be spun in a certain direction to wind, then that's one point to observe, but many movements wind in either direction.
Bike Mike Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I still prefer my method of winding watches. 1 Case of Red Bull (Jager optional), 2 glow sticks (1 in each hand) and some Techno music!
hackR Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I still prefer my method of winding watches. 1 Case of Red Bull (Jager optional), 2 glow sticks (1 in each hand) and some Techno music! there's something wrong with you...definitely something...
Jkay Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I have to admit ... it has more style than just holding a watch in each hand and twirling them for 5 minutes.
dovo1695 Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Posted February 2, 2010 Although the second tool seems to be quite a charming little machine, isn't that too busy for your movements? Thanks for the feedback; I was wondering this myself. My thought was to have it come on 8 times a day for 5-10 minutes using a $15 programmable timer. It is quite a bit of motion though. I wouldn't think that it would hurt a movement but I'm not really qualified to venture a guess. Not much point in saving a few hundred bucks on a winder if it winds up wrecking $1000 worth of movements . I’m open to opinions on whether or not the nutator provides too much/violent motion for safe watch winding. Thoughts? Link to Nutator below: http://tcssci.com/nutator/index.htm
ChipSlap Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Nutators are adjustable with regard to speed/frequency.
plaifender Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I still prefer my method of winding watches. 1 Case of Red Bull (Jager optional), 2 glow sticks (1 in each hand) and some Techno music! hahahahaha. Great image
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now