freddy333 Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Click me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eunomians Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Interesting. What magazine is the article in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted September 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Saturday's Financial Times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 I would agree. (Rolex missed the mark with their over sized designs as of late -- too long on the drawing board). I have been seeing more and more understated, but quality, watches in my travels. Seems Hamilton's, Seiko DJ Clones, etc, might be the new black.... This is making it hard to justify gutting 160x, 150x's for their movements... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member X Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 I'm not going to not buy a watch just because someone in a suit who writes for a paper and who deems themself a 'fashion guru' says so LoL If a watch looks good it looks good, period. I don't think we'll ever go back to the tiny sub-36mm days, but I imagine some of the more stupidly sized (IMHO) fashion watches (grahams, hublows etc) will fall by the wayside as they're finally recognised for being the fashion watches they are, rather than being a quality piece of classic design that will last. All IMO, of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 I'm not going to not buy a watch just because someone in a suit who writes for a paper and who deems themself a 'fashion guru' says so LoL If a watch looks good it looks good, period. I don't think we'll ever go back to the tiny sub-36mm days, but I imagine some of the more stupidly sized (IMHO) fashion watches (grahams, hublows etc) will fall by the wayside as they're finally recognised for being the fashion watches they are, rather than being a quality piece of classic design that will last. All IMO, of course I agree, I can't see watches going back to <36mm, but I would agree that the over-sized watch trend is over, and they will only remain as 'practical watches' rather than daily beaters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now