Accutronitis Posted June 14, 2015 Report Posted June 14, 2015 (edited) There will be 2 lines There will be only one line if you have a beat error of 0.0ms and if there is two lines the bigger the beat error the wider apart the lines will be...... Edited June 14, 2015 by Accutronitis
Accutronitis Posted June 14, 2015 Report Posted June 14, 2015 (edited) I have found my timegrapher 1000 ($150) to be right on the money as far as if the timegrapher says +5 s/d dial up and I leave the watch dial up for 24 hours it runs +5 s/d, if your watch spends a lot of time on your wrist in a certain position most of the time I would suggest making that the main position for adjusting the watch and then wear it a few days and if it's let's say +4 s/d adjust it in it's main position -3 s/d and check it again by wearing it for a few more days and you should be good to go...... Edited June 14, 2015 by Accutronitis
Mike on a bike Posted October 19, 2015 Report Posted October 19, 2015 Guys just pinned this so when somebody asks just send them here.
JSHen Posted January 12, 2016 Report Posted January 12, 2016 I know this is pinned, but I wanted to just say thanks for this info. It's unbelievably helpful.In that same vein I'm hoping someone can explain the lines on the pictured results.
ceejay Posted January 12, 2016 Report Posted January 12, 2016 I have strong suspicion looking at the amplitude and lift angle that this is an Omega Co Axial watch that has been measured on standard/automatic settings.The Co Axial movement needs special settings with a lift angle of around 30 degrees. Otherwise you get this very high amplitude reading.Just guessing that this was just a quick test, not under Omega service conditions?I can't decipher all the readings but it has been measured in 'positions' and is running to COSC spec. Very nice spec!Interesting that this was done at Omega but not on Co Axial settings?Sent from my iBend 6
Accutronitis Posted December 10, 2016 Report Posted December 10, 2016 The face up amplitude of 336 is pretty high but I would expect the face up or down to be the highest reading but the other 2 look very good and there is only a 4 degree difference between them, I'd like to see a little lower beat error than the 0.4 on the one but really what I want is perfection which is unreasonable so all and all not bad numbers really..... :^)
SCOOTER1 Posted January 26, 2017 Report Posted January 26, 2017 Here's a site for lift angles : http://www.lepsi.ch/lift-angle/
Recommended Posts