rrari1 Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 (edited) Anyone know where I can get a rep of this? $40 seems a bit steep to me. Especially with the terrible endlinks, and the misplaced cyclops. http://gizmodo.com/5907895 Edited May 5, 2012 by rrari1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 What on earth is the reason for this? Is it just some sort of bracelet? A bit like those coloured live strong ones? I could get it if you could drop a movement and crystal but the rubber dial is too wierd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SalvadorDantes Posted May 5, 2012 Report Share Posted May 5, 2012 I'll take eleventeen on then 70th of neverbuary/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Hawkes Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 What on earth is the reason for this? Is it just some sort of bracelet? A bit like those coloured live strong ones? I could get it if you could drop a movement and crystal but the rubber dial is too wierd It's intended as a statement against Rolexyuppies, I guess. But when trying to mock people who pay 6000 usd for a wristwatch (that's probably worth around 1000 usd or less) by buying and wearing a piece of rubber for 40 usd (that's probably worth 1 usd)... I think the joke is on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimeStopper45 Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 Lol what in the world. So the point of this rubmariner is to poke fun at owners of real submariners?... so for $40, you still will be unable to tell what time it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krpster Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 Wtf. That is just dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrandazzo Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 CGs are wrong, also SEL fit is wrong. Cyclop is misplaced on the black one, needs to be shaved off and reglued. If they are gen, how crap would be the rep? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtguk Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 And some people take the [censored] out of buying a replica watch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrari1 Posted May 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 CGs are wrong, also SEL fit is wrong. Cyclop is misplaced on the black one, needs to be shaved off and reglued. If they are gen, how crap would be the rep? Maybe you could get BK to work it over. The CG's will probably wear themselves down over time. You could make a franken with using no tools other than a lighter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 It's intended as a statement against Rolexyuppies, I guess. But when trying to mock people who pay 6000 usd for a wristwatch (that's probably worth around 1000 usd or less) by buying and wearing a piece of rubber for 40 usd (that's probably worth 1 usd)... I think the joke is on them. Yes the Irony is most amusing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woof* Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 Anyone know where I can get a rep of this? $40 seems a bit steep to me. Especially with the terrible endlinks, and the misplaced cyclops. http://gizmodo.com/5907895 Just click the 40$ in the article, takes you to the artists site that sell them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graf-fiti Posted May 6, 2012 Report Share Posted May 6, 2012 dumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky driver Posted May 7, 2012 Report Share Posted May 7, 2012 Is the rubber Cyclops ment to be at the 9? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeleni kukuruz Posted May 7, 2012 Report Share Posted May 7, 2012 I hope it has that vanilla smell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msp Posted May 7, 2012 Report Share Posted May 7, 2012 Are you genuinely serious about discussing the accuracy of this? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky driver Posted May 7, 2012 Report Share Posted May 7, 2012 Are you genuinely serious about discussing the accuracy of this? lol Is that bad? :bangin: :bangin: :bangin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now