TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 I thoroughly respect your creative streak! I have it too. Maybe that is where it stems from. Have you checked out iron on vaneers? Strangely they aren't much more than plastic! Well back on topic, the "irreversible" bit is the killer for the lugs. I can't do it to what is pretty much my favorite watch. The reason I like it so much is it is Rolex quality without having Rolex on the dial plus it just screams out "tool watch". Thanks, I would post some photos of it, but I'm experiencing camera/phone/pc issues at the moment, but I will put some up at some point in the future I feel exactly the same way about Tudors, all the style and aesthetic of a Rolex, but without The R Word on the dial, so they never draw a second (or even first) glance and fly totally under the radar I have a custom Rolex project of my own planned based on the 6542, but involving a monochromatic bezel insert and a 1016-style dial and a 1675 large GMT hand I guess that's your call on the lug bars, I just figure as you've got the replacement parts anyway, you might as well go the whole nine yards with your plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Thanks, I would post some photos of it, but I'm experiencing camera/phone/pc issues at the moment, but I will put some up at some point in the future I feel exactly the same way about Tudors, all the style and aesthetic of a Rolex, but without The R Word on the dial, so they never draw a second (or even first) glance and fly totally under the radar I have a custom Rolex project of my own planned based on the 6542, but involving a monochromatic bezel insert and a 1016-style dial and a 1675 large GMT hand I guess that's your call on the lug bars, I just figure as you've got the replacement parts anyway, you might as well go the whole nine yards with your plan Birds of a feather TeeJay! Hey if we could get Damasko to ice harden our cases we would have the ultimate watch. Rolex really should buy the patent. I mean, they bought most of their others and this would mean that they would never scratch! PS Please show us some pics when it is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneed12 Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Thanks Janeto! Everybody has gone quiet Maybe we need a clue? No, just nobody cares. That's a game my 7-year-old plays. Personally, I'm with the Zigmeister on the lume job. You took something that isn't made anymore and could never be replaced, and altered it. If you want to buy a 996 and modify it, go ahead. Porsche still runs the factories that make the parts, anything you want to change could be changed back. But don't buy a 356 and hack it up. There are fewer and fewer every year, and they're a piece of history now. If cost is no object, why destroy something irreplaceable when you can achieve exactly the same result using readily available parts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneed12 Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 I've always liked the Damasko line. Really nice aesthetic, and I like the crossed perpendicular lines motif they use a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 No, just nobody cares. That's a game my 7-year-old plays. Personally, I'm with the Zigmeister on the lume job. You took something that isn't made anymore and could never be replaced, and altered it. If you want to buy a 996 and modify it, go ahead. Porsche still runs the factories that make the parts, anything you want to change could be changed back. But don't buy a 356 and hack it up. There are fewer and fewer every year, and they're a piece of history now. If cost is no object, why destroy something irreplaceable when you can achieve exactly the same result using readily available parts? No way, your 7 year old? Sneed? I didn't think you were out of nappies yourself mate. I'm not destroying it. Any fifth grader could explain to you the laws of physics but E= MC squared and energy can't be destroyed. Just changing form and it will no doubt change back. Now, bedtime story over, go and have a lie down eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 PS The lume washes off. I don't want dead tritium. It looks the same except that it glows in the dark. Since you couldn't see it in the dark before then it can't look worse can it? You couldn't see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 I've always liked the Damasko line. Really nice aesthetic, and I like the crossed perpendicular lines motif they use a lot. Fab and of course nobody notices it. I'd like to see his case hardening tech on other watches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Birds of a feather TeeJay! Hey if we could get Damasko to ice harden our cases we would have the ultimate watch. Rolex really should buy the patent. I mean, they bought most of their others and this would mean that they would never scratch! PS Please show us some pics when it is done. I would say that that would be the icing on the cake, but for me, a watch never 'felt like it was mine' till it had received it's first ding I'll be sure to post pics when it's done No, just nobody cares. That's a game my 7-year-old plays. Personally, I'm with the Zigmeister on the lume job. You took something that isn't made anymore and could never be replaced, and altered it. If you want to buy a 996 and modify it, go ahead. Porsche still runs the factories that make the parts, anything you want to change could be changed back. But don't buy a 356 and hack it up. There are fewer and fewer every year, and they're a piece of history now. If cost is no object, why destroy something irreplaceable when you can achieve exactly the same result using readily available parts? To quote a line from GTA4, because that's Player Style! Why do people modify or customize cars? Why did Jack the Ripper cut up all those women? For the lols... When I have £10M spare, I plan on buying the MV Brigitte Bardot and having it converted into a luxury yacht for exactly the same reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 PS Having finally got the pics to load on my iPhone, I'm going to do that setup with my own 79190, because it looks awesome, and the angles of the sword hands perfctly complement the triangular markers Indeed, had Tudor released a MilSpec 79190, like Rolex did with the 5517, that is exactly what it would have looked like. It may be a fantasy build, but personally speaking, I'd consider it an accurate 'prequel' and a perfect 'what if...' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeleni kukuruz Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 PS Having finally got the pics to load on my iPhone, I'm going to do that setup with my own 79190, because it looks awesome, and the angles of the sword hands perfctly complement the triangular markers Indeed, had Tudor released a MilSpec 79190, like Rolex did with the 5517, that is exactly what it would have looked like. It may be a fantasy build, but personally speaking, I'd consider it an accurate 'prequel' and a perfect 'what if...' Hahaha ace TeeJay! But that means mine wont be the only one anymore Really happy to meet somebody that knows where I was headed with this. Maybe still am The Tudor Sub is such a perfect weight and size. So you have a 79190 too! I'll post some pics when I've loaded the new acrylic superdome and bezel. I think it will look amazing. Will you be going the fixed lug route? I have some genuine vintage Seamaster hands that I will most likely use in the final build for the sake of quality. Obviously genuine Superdome too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbutlerman Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 How are you going to put a plastic crystal on a 79190? The construction is too different i believe. The 79190 was the transition to the modern style press in crystal. I don't think there is a frugal retaining ring like on the plastic guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 How are you going to put a plastic crystal on a 79190? The construction is too different i believe. The 79190 was the transition to the modern style press in crystal. I don't think there is a frugal retaining ring like on the plastic guys. I have a 79090 retaining ring, tensioner etc. I have not taken the existing bezel off yet so I can't be sure it will fit. But unless they changed the actual case then it will. Fingers crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbutlerman Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 I think they changed the entire case. That's the only way I can figure out how they did it. That being said. I might be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alterego Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 You have a great watch and as most here have said: leave it alone. Like they say, experience is something money can't buy. Enjoy the watch in good health. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyB Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 OK, it's a DC57 Damasko. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Hahaha ace TeeJay! But that means mine wont be the only one anymore Really happy to meet somebody that knows where I was headed with this. Maybe still am The Tudor Sub is such a perfect weight and size. So you have a 79190 too! I'll post some pics when I've loaded the new acrylic superdome and bezel. I think it will look amazing. Will you be going the fixed lug route? I have some genuine vintage Seamaster hands that I will most likely use in the final build for the sake of quality. Obviously genuine Superdome too. Mine's really a composite of a reproduction 79190 dial in a rep 5513 case, not a pure 79190, but as the dial and movement were gifted by other members, it has a lot of sentimental value for me and I'd never part with it I won't be going with the fixed lug bars as my Tudor Snowflake project is a fixed lug bars, and I only want the one NATO in my collection (I don't like how they feel once they get wet) but I always keep the 79190 on a Tropic-style strap as a hot weather watch To keep the exclusivity for you, I'll put a blue insert in mine (I've been considering going with a black/blue combo for a while but was undecided which watch to modify ) Likewise, while I have a lot of respect for the purists projects, and am even planning on making my 16610 to 16800 conversion project as accurate as possible, my true passion is with customization Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Mine's really a composite of a reproduction 79190 dial in a rep 5513 case, not a pure 79190... I'm contemplating a U-Turn TeeJay in which case I will go the same route as you. Parts come up often enough. I'd just use a 2824. The strong feelings here have definitely given me second thoughts. There are less and less full sets available. Oh one last thing ... I forgot I'd swapped the dials about a year ago when I did the lume. Those who know their Tudors will know mine has the WRONG dial for a 79190 So, I must have wanted to conserve the original because my spare dial is the original, not this one. Must be a sign Now we can all sleep at night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 I'm contemplating a U-Turn TeeJay in which case I will go the same route as you. Parts come up often enough. I'd just use a 2824. The strong feelings here have definitely given me second thoughts. There are less and less full sets available. Oh one last thing ... I forgot I'd swapped the dials about a year ago when I did the lume. Those who know their Tudors will know mine has the WRONG dial for a 79190 So, I must have wanted to conserve the original because my spare dial is the original, not this one. Must be a sign Now we can all sleep at night My dial has the T SWISS MADE T markings at the six position, but it is actually a water decal over a blank dial, and the 5513 case was just one I had spare at one point, but it's always looked good I've just found a blue Mil-Spec bezel insert on eBay, so that will definitely allow me to go with that color variation I wouldn't let public opinion sway your opinion, if you want to do the mods, do the mods, as previously discussed, that's the pleasure of custom, especially when you have the spare parts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Does it say "Prince Oysterdate"? It shouldn't if it is a 79190. Here's my lumed dial at night. The compound I used is far brighter than Luminova and lasts longer in my experience. Perhaps too bright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Does it say "Prince Oysterdate"? It shouldn't if it is a 79190. Here's my lumed dial at night. The compound I used is far brighter than Luminova and lasts longer in my experience. Perhaps to bright It does read Oyster Date, so I'm not too sure which model variant that would be, but as mentioned, it is really a decal which was done by a forum member (I'll try and find a pic of it in my photobucket to post) It's never been a 1:1 replication, just always been a firm favorite, not only due to the sentimental value, but also because of the dial layout Excellent lume results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Doesn't bother me that I have the wrong dial in the 79190 either. The 79190 should say "Prince Date". Subtle change or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Doesn't bother me that I have the wrong dial in the 79190 either. The 79190 should say "Prince Date". Subtle change or what? I just double checked, and it does infact read Prince Date (I hadn't noticed earlier as the hour hand was obscuring the word Prince, and I just focussed on Date This isn't the best pic, but it gives an idea of what it looks like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastersdom Posted June 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Looks great! That may have just convinced me to build my new Milsub from parts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilFree Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 Sorry but you have ruined the watch. I wouldn't have touched a thing on it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now