Rolex Datejust 16030

[tomhorn]

Why fantasy?

The date wheel is BK's so not historically correct for this model, and I'm not sure the dial I used was available for the 16014. Technicalities for sure, but I'm happy with how it turned out.

[dwswatches]

Thanks, I'll look into this further.

[superlative]

Yes, that dial was only found on 162xx series, no lug hole DateJusts with the 3135 movement.

The date wheel is BK's so not historically correct for this model, and I'm not sure the dial I used was available for the 16014. Technicalities for sure, but I'm happy with how it turned out.

[irolexu]

I just sold a 16233 case set sorry guys!

[amespinosa]

nice build, eventhough it's a fantasy model of a 16014. if for a 16234 then it would be very correct.

[superlative]

nice build, eventhough it's a fantasy model of a 16014. if for a 16234 then it would be very correct.

162xx series DJs had no lug holes. Still a fantasy DJ. Nice dial though.

[kbh]

Would this one be a fantasy also? Same dial in gold with lug holes.

Regardless, I still like it.

[tomhorn]

Twin Brothers from different mothers KBH ... and thanks again for the dial ... 'incorrect' as it may be ...

Edited September 17, 2012 by tomhorn

[1680]

You can put a 3135 on a 3035 movement, and since the late 16000 models had the 3035 this combo wouldn't be impossible.