Nooringoox Posted March 3, 2013 Report Share Posted March 3, 2013 I like to show you a comparision of Panerai 351 Rep vs. Gen. Gen: Of year 2012 (O) with original strap, unworn Rep: Of year 2012 from Puretime with Kaktus Drifter Havanna from Kaktus Straps (Fransson), used several months. PAM 351 is my most beloved PAM (beneath PAM 390) because of: Despite of the 17mm height you can wear it very pleasantly. This is because the titanium case is lighter than the steen ones (e.g. 312). The brown dial and the golden hands looks very beautiful and special. Here are some perfectly suitable straps for PAM 351 (or PAM 390): Kaktus Drifter Havanna from Kaktus Straps (Fransson). My favorite because the leather color fits perfect to the dial and the bright stiching to the numerals. The leather of Kaktus Drifter Havanna is unrufflet. Black Choco from Rob Montana (The Strap Smith) - Also perfect in leather color. The leather has more structure than Kaktus Drifter Havanna and the stiching is beige. Dark Chocolate von dstrap.com (Olaf) - Similar to Black Choco from Rob Montana. Now the comparison - Gen on left, rep on right: Very good: Case shape, color and finish Hands Position of numerals Crystal shape and color AR Improveable: Dial color. Rep is brighter and Gen is more mate. And now, let's zoom. First the gen: The rep: You can see more differences: The numerals of rep are a little wider and not such accurate. The font of the rep are thicker. The numbers on the date wheel of the rep are thinner and 3 dates (29, 30 and 31) are not printed accurately. There are some brown spots within the numbers. The dial color is a little different. The rep is a little copper. The cannon pin of the rep is not flat but domed. Now let's see the crown and the CG. First the rep: Now the gen: You can see: The encraving "REG." and "T.M." on the rep is a little thicker. The lever of rep is much smaller. It hat more clearance. The outer edge has another shape. It can be folded out more. The milling groove of CG (where the crown sits) is more straight (hope I use the right terms for this). The prings of the crown are less beveled on the rep. Back side of gen: Back side of rep: The pin of the CG from the rep is 0,5 to 1mm to short. Completely different movement (Gen: P.9000 / Rep: Asian 7750). Crystal of rep looks slightly thicker. Crystal of rep is a little less clean. Encravings on rep are correkct, but the font is a little thicker. The pins for strap changing are nearer to the case on the rep, but the straps fits right. Here are some pictures from the sides: Gen: Rep: Other side: Gen: Rep: Finally two more pictures from the rep: First with Kaktus Drifter Havanna: Second with DStrap Dark Chocolate:Conlusion: The replica PAM 351 is a very nice watch. Look and wearing comfort are excellent. The titan case , the warm brown dial and the golden hands makes it to a special watch without beeing too eye-caching. There are some differences between gen and rep but these differences are not easy to spot (except the movement). You need know the gen or need to compare gen and rep side by side to see most differences. But there is potential for the factories to eliminate the remaining flaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nooringoox Posted March 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2013 Sorry, Rep and Gen pictures of CG are swapped. I can't find out how to edit my post :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted March 4, 2013 Report Share Posted March 4, 2013 Dude , that's a fantastic post thank you for putting that together. I reckon the 3## 1950 range is so underrated and RWG'rs are missing a lot of watch because of their dislike of the movement. Sorry if I missed it but did you buy that Gen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imajedi Posted March 4, 2013 Report Share Posted March 4, 2013 Love my 351. Put it on a Gunny and it's unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sagaraliasjacky007 Posted March 5, 2013 Report Share Posted March 5, 2013 not a great 1:1 rep! could have been better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted March 5, 2013 Report Share Posted March 5, 2013 I reckon the 3## 1950 range is so underrated and RWG'rs are missing a lot of watch because of their dislike of the movement. With you all the way on that one. Love my 386 - really stands out as different in my collection. 351 is calling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martijnp Posted March 5, 2013 Report Share Posted March 5, 2013 Great and helpfull post! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATEspo Posted March 5, 2013 Report Share Posted March 5, 2013 I LOVE my 312, I may have to look into the 351! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzy81 Posted March 5, 2013 Report Share Posted March 5, 2013 Thank you for the post and the great pictures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tech Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Excellent post! Thanks for sharing with us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inertiadrifter Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 Great review!! Saving for a GEN 351, unless they create a true 1:1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now