DoubleWristed Posted July 1, 2013 Report Posted July 1, 2013 Thanks in advance fellas!Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Nanuq Posted July 1, 2013 Report Posted July 1, 2013 There are a couple things about it that look "off". Plus it looks like it's fitting within the rehaut, not beneath the rehaut.
devilseam Posted July 1, 2013 Report Posted July 1, 2013 If thats the 'supposedly' franken 1675 for sale on RWI, I would leave well alone. He has already been called out on the Insert which he claimed was gen and as nanuq suggested the dial doesnt look right plus IMO the crown guards are terrible.
irolexu Posted July 1, 2013 Report Posted July 1, 2013 Hmm. I have to agree these parts smell like they were pieced together. Crown guards do look funny but it could be angle of the shot..
SSTEEL Posted July 1, 2013 Report Posted July 1, 2013 Looks like the dial is too small as mentioned above regarding its fitting, and mating with rehault.
alligoat Posted July 1, 2013 Report Posted July 1, 2013 It would be ironic if it were a gen dial in a rep case! But the ageing on the dial lume plots looks suspect to me Yellow hands look like some of my work- I'm hell on matching dials and hands.
docthor Posted July 2, 2013 Report Posted July 2, 2013 It would be ironic if it were a gen dial in a rep case! ... I have nothing to mention about the dial but I really don't understand your objection
bwhitesox Posted July 2, 2013 Report Posted July 2, 2013 It would be ironic if it were a gen dial in a rep case! But the ageing on the dial lume plots looks suspect to me Yellow hands look like some of my work- I'm hell on matching dials and hands. Yip those hands are aweful.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now