grew Posted January 27, 2014 Report Posted January 27, 2014 So I bought this watch based off these pictures and while everything to me looks good curious what everyone else thinks.
GBOGH Posted January 28, 2014 Report Posted January 28, 2014 The lugs look very thick compared to the cases on my two gens, and crown looks very thin as well. How much did you get it for?
grew Posted January 28, 2014 Author Report Posted January 28, 2014 I paid $3,800. So its a gamble. I do have recourse if its not real though. Just curious as the caseback engraving looks really good and so does the crystal and the dial printing. The CP looks perfectly flush and the date mag looks gen too. I guess I didn't notice the Crown being thin.....
grew Posted January 28, 2014 Author Report Posted January 28, 2014 I"m pretty sure its the 40mm one (as the hands on the 44mm one are different) so that might explain the thin Crown?
grew Posted January 28, 2014 Author Report Posted January 28, 2014 Well, Looks like its not a screaming deal just a decent one. Still a pretty cool watch to wear around for awhile.
Grimlocktime Posted January 28, 2014 Report Posted January 28, 2014 I'm not familiar with the lug shape on the 40mm case, but the Cyclops looks gen to me.
SSTEEL Posted January 28, 2014 Report Posted January 28, 2014 Looks the real deal to me, but I have to confess I'm no PAM expert. Looks in pretty well worn condition, and the previous owner was obviously not afraid to get it scratched, back case too, shame.
ceejay Posted January 28, 2014 Report Posted January 28, 2014 Whip the back off, all will be revealed
korneevy Posted January 28, 2014 Report Posted January 28, 2014 Show the movement, that's your only ticket to knowing
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now