bvall Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 (edited) Hi guys! Just got my QC pictures and need your opinion about the pictures. I think it looks great overall but there is something that seems off with the bezel at 12 a clock. I have highlighted what I think looks off. I have asked for more pictures of the bezel and will post those when I get them. While uploading the pictures I noticed that the hour-hand is covering the omega-logo, I hope it wont be covered in the new pictures. The pictures: Here's what I think looks off, but it could probably be a reflection. The new pictures will tell. Thanks for looking! Please leave a comment Edited March 11, 2014 by bvall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Okey, here's the new picture of the bezel. Is something wrong with the triangle or is it just me? I know, its a macro shot and I think it's fantastic watch besides that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minx Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I would ask for another watch. It's a small flaw but it will always catch your eye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 (edited) I answered and asked for a exchange, hate to be that guy.. It's a small flaw but as you say, it will always catch my eye. Edited March 11, 2014 by bvall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Msmayhugh Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I answered and asked for a exchange, hate to be that guy.. It's a small flaw but as you say, it will always catch my eye. Post up pics of the new one when you get them! I never get tired of looking at the CrPO!! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I will! It's a fantastic watch and replica Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceejay Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Sloppy Lume & in the first pictures the top of the 2 in the date window is slightly chopped, apart from the bezel. I would have asked for another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seafoam Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Agreed. The triangle is enough to reject it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) Here's the new QC pictures. The "2" in "12" is a little bit low but I accepted this watch since this is such a small flaw and it wont be something that me or anyone else will see. I have seen the same on gen watches too. It's macro shots and a replica after all. The pictures: The pearl looks really good I will post wrist shots when I get the watch Edited March 12, 2014 by bvall 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipw1999 Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Looks fine to me if you can live with the "2". In real life it's probably totally unnoticeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceejay Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 The amplitude is way low, it needs a service... Sent from my toilet using Andrex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Okey, that seems bad.. It couldn't be that the watch is poorly winded or something like that? I don't have that much knowledge about movements :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topgun99 Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 By which TD will you buy the watch? Btw it's a beauty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) It's from primetime. He's a really good dealer! Edited March 12, 2014 by bvall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fracture Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) The first one seemed quite good mechanically. +002 s/d is a great number. I think all Noobs have some small issues with the bezel paint. I currently have 3 Noob PO's and there's only one of which I find the bezel of acceptable quality. Edited March 12, 2014 by j3t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Msmayhugh Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 The first one seemed quite good mechanically. +002 s/d is a great number. I think all Noobs have some small issues with the bezel paint. I currently have 3 Noob PO's and there's only one of which I find the bezel of acceptable quality. Yeah, but if you look at the graph, they were literally measuring for only a few seconds. It takes a while for the timegraph to settle in on an accurate measurement. The second watch was measured for an even shorter amount of time. All those pics really show is that the watch was running. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devnull Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Just got my QC pics..looking forward to this watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromag Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Here's the new QC pictures. The "2" in "12" is a little bit low but I accepted this watch since this is such a small flaw and it wont be something that me or anyone else will see. I have seen the same on gen watches too. It's macro shots and a replica after all. The pictures: The pearl looks really good I will post wrist shots when I get the watch Is it just me or does that dial look way off center? It looks like the 12 is too far to the right when using sel as gauge. Also therefore the 6 marker looks too far to the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 I think the bezel is a bit turned, that makes the whole dial look wrong, I will see how it is when I get the watch. Is there something I can do if the watch is totally off? Can I send it back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromag Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Who is primetime btw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvall Posted March 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 That was a typo on my phone, should be PureTime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromag Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Ah! I just checked the omega site and their gen looks off too. So I guess it's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fracture Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Can I send it back? Probably not, and you shouldn't. I think most members will agree you should only send a watch back if it's DOA or has other severe mechanical issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceejay Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) Amplitude is low, beat error is not shown, watch running fast. I would ask for a better/ longer reading as after all, the job of a watch is to tell the time to some accuracy...no? I fact it would be nice to see a reading with the watch crown down Edited March 19, 2014 by ceejay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now