docthor Posted September 5, 2016 Report Posted September 5, 2016 or not? What you say? https://uhrforum.de/rolex-gmt-master-1675-a-t267002 The case especially the cgs look questionable to me...
SSTEEL Posted September 5, 2016 Report Posted September 5, 2016 Crown looks incorrect too. Too small?
Guest BimmerLover Posted September 5, 2016 Report Posted September 5, 2016 Gen 1675 have 5.3mm crown, to me look ok!
Nanuq Posted September 5, 2016 Report Posted September 5, 2016 Here's mine from 1964. Looks pretty close. Why doesn't his caseback have 44 years of wear?
docthor Posted September 5, 2016 Author Report Posted September 5, 2016 7 minutes ago, Nanuq said: Why doesn't his caseback have 44 years of wear? That's the point...the case as well as the cb looks just too crisp, too fat for a 44year old case. And since the crown has lots of space between the cgs my guess is that at least the case is rep...
alligoat Posted September 5, 2016 Report Posted September 5, 2016 Nanuq's caseback is polished, the sellers is brushed in the center- he also doesn't show the inside of the caseback with the III/72. In fact his pictures basically suck- no head on shot of the dial, no look at the datewheel. no decent pic of the cgs except the rear one. Movement shot wouldn't hurt either, but he's probably one of those who can't take off the caseback- or maybe it is a replacement case. That insert's red color is interesting- never seen a fade like that either- definitely unique... Got to trust the seller first.
lumbee Posted September 6, 2016 Report Posted September 6, 2016 looks dubious to me. Especially since he managed to hide any view of the date wheel.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now