jonthebhoy Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 If it's a fake, it's a pretty convincing one. Therefore I'll say real! JTB
ubiquitous Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 Maybe it's the pic... Or maybe it's just me... But that crown doesn't look too good...
elprimerozen Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 Maybe it's the pic... Or maybe it's just me... But that crown doesn't look too good... The first pic is gen i see that there something is wrong....?
olreon Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 hello, both are gens! the pics only have a bad quality! best wishes olreon
lovepanerai Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 gens just look at the hobnail on the dial and the dial print in general - and the crowns on the 40mm just suck period
ubiquitous Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 Ahhh... 40mm. That explains the crown (I was thinking 44mm's...).
HauteHippie Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 I'm in the gen camp on this one too. The cyclops and dial are my basis for judgement here.
Finepics Posted January 13, 2007 Report Posted January 13, 2007 Crown is not in focus which might be why it looks funny. Too difficult to say from this pic so I will go with gen just because you asked!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now