drop Posted September 14, 2007 Report Posted September 14, 2007 I think the case markings look fantastic. Thanks for sharing! Are you going Clark or gen on the superdomes?
juca Posted September 14, 2007 Report Posted September 14, 2007 Millions of thanks Stephane well next question maybe is even harder for a begginer, which of the Crystals is the one for my 1680? there is so many there on Clarks catalog, i am sure you can answer this one as well thanks again.
juca Posted September 17, 2007 Report Posted September 17, 2007 Any one to tell me which of the Clark Crystal is the one there for my 1680? warmest regards to all you great guys!!!
Stephane Posted September 17, 2007 Author Report Posted September 17, 2007 I have no idea Juca. I'm using genuines. Now, if you eMail the guys on eBay they will tell you.
juca Posted September 17, 2007 Report Posted September 17, 2007 Stephane Millions of thanks, ill do that
alligoat Posted September 17, 2007 Report Posted September 17, 2007 Looking at the global bill (from which MM work is a share only of course), I will not go for anything like gen mvt or gen hollow mid link bracelet But, yes, the hollow mid link seem to be the one needed with 558 end links according to Tribal. The riveted is stunning but not accurate. It's my favourite option though. A gen that would match a 1665 or 1680 could be found but not for less than 400 to 700 $ According to my two charts on Rolex bracelets, a 1665 would have either a 9315 (early) with maybe 285 end pieces, or later would be the 93150 with 580 end pieces and then 585 end pieces. Being a GW, which is the latest of the 1665 models, the 93150 w/ 585 endpieces would be the cats meow, so to speak. My DRSD from Paul has the 93150 hollow mid link bracelet w/ the 580 end pieces. Not bad for a rep bracelet. Like you say, gen will run $400-700. Here's one of the links: http://www.14270.com/spec-rolex.htm As is always the case w/ vintage Rolex, there are always exceptions to the rules and no telling what an AD might do.
Stephane Posted September 17, 2007 Author Report Posted September 17, 2007 ooops, I think I misspelled: 558 - 585 Thanks for clarifying this. But, your link, what is it ? A source for bracelet ? Or only info...
alligoat Posted September 17, 2007 Report Posted September 17, 2007 That link is an info only link, I think it came from avitt a few months ago. Here's the other one which was posted on TZ a while back: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/exs...aceletchart.jpg Between the two, you can get pretty close, but there are mistakes on each list and omissions
Stephane Posted September 17, 2007 Author Report Posted September 17, 2007 Thank you so much. Cheers Stephane
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now