maxse Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 (edited) Let's hear it? Which one do you guys think is more accurate-looking? Edited April 9, 2008 by maxse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Davidsen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 yep i agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxse Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Even with that weird space between "Swiss Made?" For some reason it seems to me that it is more of a tell then it touching the 6, no? Also what about that short marker? Why do you say that one is more accurate than the other? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 To me, the "L SWISS MADE L" touching the 6 is more bothering than the large space between SWISS and MADE. The short marker @9Hr is supposed to be an easy fix for a relumer. What I feel placing DSN one step forward is his very accurate caseback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmurphy926 Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 To me, the "L SWISS MADE L" touching the 6 is more bothering than the large space between SWISS and MADE. The short marker @9Hr is supposed to be an easy fix for a relumer. What I feel placing DSN one step forward is his very accurate caseback. I don't know. From what I see on the Panerai site, the Andrew dial looks closer to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archibald Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Davidsen's is more accurate, but both versions represent blown opportunities to make what could have easily been one of the most accurate PAMs of all time--all of the needed parts already existed, even most of the dial: all they needed to do was get the l-swiss-l right and cleanly engrave the correct digits on the caseback. Both makers screwed up both things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrgreen Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Davidsen's is more accurate, but both versions represent blown opportunities to make what could have easily been one of the most accurate PAMs of all time--all of the needed parts already existed, even most of the dial: all they needed to do was get the l-swiss-l right and cleanly engrave the correct digits on the caseback. Both makers screwed up both things. which rather bears out the thought the manufactures are perposely not making them look too accurate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat.tail.event Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Let's hear it? Which one do you guys think is more accurate-looking? FYI- David is in the process of fixing the shorter seconds hand and will be updating with photos in the dealer section when complete. He didnt give an expected time on completion... So with a couple mm's of lume at '9', you'll be in great shape with DSN's rep. Has anyone emailed about this fix? It sounded like he got feedback to fix the seconds hand from a few folks, maybe he'll help on this improvement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slai Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 dsn's CGs and crown on his autos just aren't up to par imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat.tail.event Posted April 13, 2008 Report Share Posted April 13, 2008 FYI- David is in the process of fixing the shorter seconds hand and will be updating with photos in the dealer section when complete. He didnt give an expected time on completion... So with a couple mm's of lume at '9', you'll be in great shape with DSN's rep. Has anyone emailed about this fix? It sounded like he got feedback to fix the seconds hand from a few folks, maybe he'll help on this improvement... David posted his April 08 upgrade photos on 'bucket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolli Posted April 13, 2008 Report Share Posted April 13, 2008 here are two images of the gen 104. 1.) older 104 2.) new 104 rolli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now