Sub 16610 Dial Authentic?

[Bluray]

Just wondering if there is a way one of you could tell me if this sub dial is authentic from the pics? A guy says he doesn't know if it is but is selling it? So I dont know what to pay for it without knowing...any way too?

[Tribal]

No sorry

[alligoat]

NO! Dial feet are in the wrong place, back is all wrong, dial print sucks, it's not even the quality of a noob dial!

[LordRasta]

I'm no Rolex expert but you want to look for this: See where it says 300m and beneath that CHRONOMETER? The "m" from 300m and the "M" from CHRONOMETER should line up with the "m" on top obviously. The better reps like the Noob are perfect in this sense so you can't only go by that but this one is WAAAAAAY off.

[Samurai]

I'm no Rolex expert but you want to look for this: See where it says 300m and beneath that CHRONOMETER? The "m" from 300m and the "M" from CHRONOMETER should line up with the "m" on top obviously. The better reps like the Noob are perfect in this sense so you can't only go by that but this one is WAAAAAAY off.

Am not into Rolexes....but that's a damn good tip.

Cheers

[w.genzo]

Some gen dials have the "m" that does not align perfectly.

Like on YM, there are many variances among 16610 dials.

Anyway your dial is completely different from a gen one.

[rolex001]

This is one bad replica dial...

[jfreeman420]

Aside from all that has been mentioned, the lume is all over the place. The white is overflowing the silver rings.

[Bluray]

ahh ok thanks guys great tips this is a no go then and I will certainly look for those things in my search!