Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

AMK000

Member
  • Posts

    1,430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AMK000

  1. Hi guys.

    I have the Chop GMT panda, both with rubber band and bracelet.

    Thinking to replace the rubber band with a lether strap (racing or not .... dont really care).

    Any alternatives out there ..... having in mind that:

    - the mm at the lugs and buckle of the watch are not quite standard

    - the chopard clasp (that come with the rubber band) has that fat pin that is hard to get into the strap holes.

    Any ideas out there ????

    Thanks

  2. Unless you get the Cyclops removed, and an AR coated Chieftang 7mm cyclops installed instead. That's what I'm doing. I don't care that the gen does not have AR, my rep will. What's the point of having a tuxedo dial if you can't see it clearly? The non-AR coated standard crystal completely washes out the dial and it's texture.

    I have the 029 with 2893-2 .... and I fully agree with you.

    Without AR you cannot really get the beauty of the Tuxedo dial.

    post-106-1196917899_thumb.jpg

    post-106-1196917916_thumb.jpg

  3. Nice review Euno and good to hear that it has not the problems of the CD version.

    Since the AR is nothing near compared to the Superocean , how it is compared to the ultimate UPO ??? (if you have this to compare it).

    Date and number fonts have a week white color ??

  4. How do you guys assemble it back in?

    Just received my PO 45 and managed to get the pins out in order to resize the bracelet. But wasn't able to get them back in through the tubes.

    Brought it to a watchsmith today.

    You need a case holder and a plastic (head) hammer

  5. :p

    Remember I said no compilation shots anymore, after the dread Strapitis thread. Instead, I have gone on record saying that I'll always post a different watch in each Wristcheck. Hope you have been paying attention. :D

    (Same goes for my straps. There's a new one in each Wristie)

    post-106-1195910026_thumb.jpg

    Try one of these :D

  6. @AMK000,

    A response as a singular mod... not from the team.

    Yes, we were well aware of the situation, as it unfolded from information from members; it was the subject of much discussion within admin.

    And yes, steps were taken to protect members... for instance, he wasn't banned, to leave the door open for ongoing contact.(and some others, not to be disclosed here)

    As far as a written warning to members, I beleive the many threads on the subject-just some of which I post below-

    http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?s=&amp...st&p=324725

    http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?s=&amp...st&p=349540

    http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?s=&amp...st&p=239287

    should have been ample warning for any member who carried out even the remotest search!

    However all this info surfaced "after the event", and we certainly didn't have a crystal ball to fortell actions.

    The reason for this forum, is for information to pass freely... in a perfect world it would all be positive and useful info, in this case negative, but still useful info was published.

    Where possible we try to leave it to the members to arrive at their own judgements, and only act when we see irrefutable scam attempts in progress ( you would be amazed at how many new "members' are removed at 1st or 2nd post!... 1 in the last 24 hours)

    I might add, that just like the general membership, there was a variance of opinions within admin, however, as always, the most popular opinion held sway, and the team proceeded on that course of action.

    So I beleive the judgement call of the team, finally has been proven correct, contact has been restablished, and it would appear that things are being sorted.

    But we are not the rep police, we manage the running of the forum, not the policing of actions, or lack thereof, of members.

    Offshore

    @Offshore:

    My whole intention was a positive critisism. Honest.

    The indicate topics shown above, are fairly new ..... , the members reviews not always indicate the true situation and many

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up