Pugwash

Second banning but third or fourth account deletion.

Sure we are. Merely our wearing replicas devalues their brand. ps. Oh, and we're all tax cheats.

Have you asked the dealer for a replacement?

Very interesting stuff.

Still need a lot more information... Asian 7750?

Cheers.

What, this one?

Can you show us a photo of what you mean? A lot more info is needed before anyone can say if they can fix it or not.

Uh-oh. Someone ought to tell them they're masturbating their cat.

I presume it's an error as opposed to an actual ban ...

What Ad Hominem attacks?

Which one?

It's not going to happen. They've got this whole faith thing going on which basically says that if they search for proof it's because their belief isn't strong enough and therefore they need to give a bit more cash to their church (optional, but encouraged ) and get back to believing.

It seems civilised enough for now.

I have done so sufficiently to myself. I think, therefore I am, and all that. How can I not be a figment of your imagination? Simple: You're not that clever.

If you're going down the proof route, the believers have to prove there's a god. There is no question here. Two views, both with the same result: 1: Why? Well, the default state is nothingness and you're trying to tell us there's something we can't see. Prove it. 2: We're happy with no god and you're the one trying to convince us there's a god. You can't say "There's a god, you have to believe me, prove to me I'm wrong!" or else we're in the Flying Spaghetti Monster argument. There's no Santa Claus, there's no Easter Bunny and there's no God. If you want to maintain that there is a God (which I don't actually believe you have tried to do, to be honest) because it makes you happy, like the Tooth Fairy, then sure, carry on, but one day, you'll grow up and realise they were lying to you because it was easier to deal with tooth-loss or buying chocolates or whatever. "Then why," asked the Eskimo earnestly, "did you tell me?"

That daywheel sure looks familiar ...

This is my crown-guard job. This should be the last pic of it like this as, thanks to Kurt, I finish off the inside over the next few days...

I'm getting mails now. Yay!

Perfect. That's what I was trying to say but obviously was too stupid to express as well.

Seeing as it was the only difference between the iPod and its nearest competitor when the iPod was released, I'd say we know the outcome of that one.

The truth is that Xerox corporate in NY simply didn't see the value of the GUI and traded the rights to Apple to use anything they saw on a fact-finding mission. Xerox granted Apple engineers three days of access to the PARC facilities in return for selling them one million dollars in pre-IPO Apple stock, and the stock was valued at $18 000 000 when they went public, so what some people call stealing, Xerox call being paid $17 000 000. And yes, Xerox didn't realise that they could sue Apple until Apple sued MS, and by then it was too late.

Yeah, some dogs are just bastards.

Very dressy!