Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

sssurfer

Member
  • Posts

    3,402
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sssurfer

  1. Once more with feeling: Nudity isn't porn.

    And Repaustria's post surely did not contain porn (neither nudity, as well), still you came out with speaking about masturbation.

    I can re-phrase my sentence with 'porn' in place of 'nudity' if you prefer, it does not change a bit about its meaning:

    ' This is the 2nd time that you make a compulsory association between seeing porn and masturbation. '

    You have no idea how amusing your image of me is.

    Surely I don't have (and I don't care to have).

    Personally, I feel no amusement at the image of a man who does not consider that other men can look at nudity or porn and they still do not think about masturbation. A man who uses charges of masturbation as his next-level argument to those he does not agree with.

    Btw, it seems as you even think that masturbating is a worse thing than trying to drive others to conform their behavior to someone else's idea of decence and morality.

  2. This isn't about anyone ruining anyone's fun, or puritanical witch-hunts

    Yes, it is, as long as one can simply switch avatars off but he rather prefers to pontificate others about decence and morality in a community.

    How's about I spell it out for you. If you use a porn avatar, and I include out-of-context [censored], you are probably reading this forum naked with one hand on the mouse and the other in your genital area.

    And here is how I spell it for you. This is the 2nd time (the first is here) that you make a compulsory association between seeing nudity and masturbation. This goes a long way in telling of your mental attitude.

    As Highflyingclive said,

    Evil is in the eye of the beholder.
  3. "LASIK@Home is committed to bringing clear vision to those less fortunate. We encourage you to donate your old eyeglasses to your local school, Lions Club, or other charity."

    They should just say "your old eyes" in place of "your old eyeglasses".

    Ok, maybe this is an old thread, but it is simply irresistible.

  4. Thanks, Mig.

    What a shame on us Italian people.

    Not only because he's trying to foolish buyers, but also because he's doing it in such a risible way. :evil2:

    Certifidato di garanzia.

    A 2002 watch with a H dial.

    The crown seems not so bad in some pics, though -- I wonder if he replaced it.

    Sto considerando se sputtanarlo (I am thinking about calling him out).

  5. Yes, the watch definitely has moisture (humidity) inside and when the temperature of the crystal becomes lower than the temperature inside the case then moisture condensates to the fog that you saw attached to the crystal.

    It's unlikely that moisture came from the crystal -- it just condensates there because the crystal is more exposed to temperature changes than other watch parts (e.g., like your car windshield).

    Most likely points for moisture income are the caseback and the crown tube -- maybe defective or missing o-rings.

    You have two goals now:

    1 - To remove the moisture that is already inside. Any of the ways suggested before is good, but please consider that fog disappearing does not mean that moisture has gone -- just that it de-condensated again. As you already experienced, fog may come back again as soon as temperature changes. In order to be sure that moisture has definitely gone, place a small piece of ice on the crystal, then wait a little, then clean: if the crystal is not foggy, moisture has gone.

    Also consider that placing the watch, caseback opened, in a warm place (e.g. a black or see-through box under a lamp) along with a bag of silica gel dessiccant may speed up the departure of moisture.

    2 - To prevent moisture from re-entering into the case. Replace the back and crown o-rings. Only if moisture re-enters again, then replace the teflon o-ring where the crystal sits.

    Best wishes!

  6. I understand people being crazy about rolexes, they're quite a status symbol and a brand synonomous with having money.

    Exactly. You don't wear a PAM as a status symbol and/or to suggest that you have money.

    You may wear it because:

    1 - Uh... just try and you will know :D.

    2 - To suggest that you have taste.

    3 - To suggest that you are a connoisseur.

    4 - To suggest that you are elitary about minds, not about wallets.

    (Btw, it is my sad duty to inform you that you are already affected with paneritis in phase 1).

  7. Just my little experience:

    I had great results from bleaching brown straps, but I have been completely unable to bleach black straps (Don's and Hirsch's) so far.

    Black straps seemed to have sort of a rubber/gum coating that did not get its color modified by bleaching until it rather dissolved.

    I had to throw away the Hirsh strap. Don's is still usable, but honestly uglier than before bleaching.

  8. The project has beginning.

    For now you will have to be satisfied with this.

    Shortly I will develop whether to realize it and I will show the relative schemes.

    I'm sorry because I'm not very good to draw by hand free.

    77963-31073.jpg

    No doubt a very original and challenging design, Mahler!

    I just wonder how easy it is to get it realized -- uhm, not on my skills, at least.

    I also wonder a little on whether it is going to meet the taste of PAM owners, usually very minimalist in strap design (differently from strap size :D).

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up