#1
#2
My watch looks exactly the same as #2 and the Crown is BANG in the middle between watch case and inner edge of Crown guard.
THERE IS MORE GAP THAN IT SHOULD BE, genuine PAM the gap is no more 25% whilst the Rep PAM gap is 50%, visually BIG gap!
I 'handled' 3 genuine PAM handwind including a PAM 111.
All three handwind PAMs had a SMALL gap between watch case and Crown, for all intended purposes it was 'almost 'flush.
There was NO discernible gap and I also had a go at handwinding the genuine PAM movement and it feels so smooth like turning the crown to set the time compared to ratcheting feeling when winding Asian Unitas movements. Also when the gen PAM movement is fully wound its like a fully tightened screw, IMPOSSIBLE to turn anymore you would need to to HERCULES to turn it anymore when its fully wound!
Anyway I digress and THERE WAS NO DISCERNIBLE GAP between watchcase and Crown for Genuine PAM handwind.
After studying the 3 genuine handwind PAMs I conclude for Rep PAM handwinds the the top of the tube PROTRUDES too much from watch case and the Crown does not sit enough over the top of the tube. In fact the top of the gen tube is 50% shorter and a different shape more like a hexagonal short nut if that makes sense!
Crown on rep PAM 111 NOT close to being FLUSH
Any other advice other than 'matched tube and Crown"/
It seems the problem that the Crown does not "sit enough" over the top of tube when the Crown is depressed in?
is it possible that the stem is too long or the rep tube is too long [i.e the bit that sticks out from end of watch case]
the gen PAM tube is way shorter and sticks out 50% less than the Rep tube
Advice and comments please