I don't care much subjective articles like that, far less when there are factual mistakes involved.
No watch company "submitted" its watch for NASA testing, they were unmodified stock versions bought in jewelery stores. That's actually a thing particularly interesting about Omega's Speedmaster, because it passed all the severe beatings nevertheless. I'm not sure about the Hillary story either, supposedly he wrote this letter to Rolex or Rolex aswell, who knows (or cares)? For what it's worth he could have carried a 0,50$ gift watch underneath his suit and it still would have worked fine up there.
Rolex watches are pure design classics. They don't need to be flashy or innovative in any way and yes they are overpriced but so is every high-end watch. The movements are fine you won't notice any difference to a standard ETA in a 1000$ watch or another company's in-House movement under normal conditions.
Since I started collecting watches I noticed one thing - nobody cares for your watch. No matter what brand you are wearing, nobody notices - except for other watch enthusiasts. In the end it comes down to subjective taste, to each his own.