What is good and bad about this?

[MrMD]

Okay, this is just meant as a bit of fun to see what people think of this Sub.

Can any of you guess which one it is?

http://www.rwgforum.com/uploads/monthly_12_2009/post-23863-126106970239_thumb.jpg

[alligoat]

The bottom of the pic says Rolex WM9. Good rehaut, good pearl, it's the best rep out there at the moment.

[watcher]

V1 or 1.5 Hard to tell though from that angle but I think V1.

[MrMD]

I may have mislead you by calling the image, wm9. It does not come from them.

This is a much cheaper rep.

It is interesting how good the bottom end reps are becoming...

[highoeyazmuhudee]

CGs, Bezel insert print, crown may be too thick, the crystal gasket exchange also looks odd in the pics, the rehaut isnt deep enough, and the case tube is not like gen, large laser etched crown. good dial tho

looks like a typical noobmariner to me. nothing wrong with that, it's a good rep at a good price, just so much has been advanced since then.

[lhooq]

Looks like one of Reg's Nymphos!

[gplracer]

The ledge where the crystal meets the insert is not gen like. It looks more like the construction of a noobmariner. Still a nice rep though

[alligoat]

It's not bad looking, but I'd still like to see something that has gen characteristics like the bezel assembly, taking a gen insert and gen crystal- all the advances made by WM9 and the euromariner/MBW in a less expensive rep..