Fer Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 You would be crazy to sell that beauty......definitely a keeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I don't get it. I thought the screw hole in the V2 case would be slightly lower than the V3 case..making the tube and then the crown sit slightly lower. I have a V3 and wouldn't mind doing this mod, but I like the height of the crown in my watch- want to keep it there. its all marketing sadly V2 has the better middle-case .... but nobody will call you out wearing a WM9 1-3 Sub - if you handle it over its a different story cheers, Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gplracer Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 As usual very nice job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stilty Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Here are a Gen Z-Series for comparsion The crown position on the genuine article is quite different then on the WM9 case. In this pic, you can see how the case tube is just sitting proud on the top edge of the case. See how the top edge of the mid case is just below the case tube. Anyone have a pic of the V2 or V3 in similar position to make a comparison? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtanak Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 You might be right about the tube position.. But if someone had to unscrew the crown to check this to know if its a rep... that'd made my day... Now how can we fit a 3135 into a V2..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdick Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 The crown position on the genuine article is quite different then on the WM9 case. In this pic, you can see how the case tube is just sitting proud on the top edge of the case. See how the top edge of the mid case is just below the case tube. Anyone have a pic of the V2 or V3 in similar position to make a comparison? Pics from wm9, don't know which version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praetor Posted June 19, 2010 Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 (edited) That's a v3, the v2 bezel has its angle (top) slope down too much. Btw, how do you tell if your insert snapped in securely? my gen insert snapped but isn't recessed in the bezel. Edited June 19, 2010 by praetor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtanak Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Just wondering since the original mvmt in the WM9 V2 is a 2762 or the ladies mvmt... would a 2836-2 fit in the case with the height diff compared to the 2824? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 A 2836 will fit fine with the correct movement ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtanak Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 A 2836 will fit fine with the correct movement ring. Thanks for reply watcher.. any reasons why the 2824 is preferred over the 2836? Transplanting either mvmt will require a fitting mvmt ring as well right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now