Yachtmaster on Ebay

[watcher]

I don't often do this but this watch just does not look right to me. It looks like a noob factiory or early WM9 'F' serial fake.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PRE-OWN-ROLEX-OYSTER-PERPETUAL-YACHTMASTER-16622-F-/180505992475?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Wristwatches&hash=item2a06fedd1b

[plaifender]

I don't often do this but this watch just does not look right to me. It looks like a noob factiory or early WM9 'F' serial fake.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PRE-OWN-ROLEX-OYSTER-PERPETUAL-YACHTMASTER-16622-F-/180505992475?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Wristwatches&hash=item2a06fedd1b

The wm9 usually look better than this watch i think. The cyclops might be too far right. but it's too hard to tell with the angle of his shots since there is no direct shot of the dial. The biggest tell is probably the "yacht-master" on the dial should be a much darker red.... I'm no expert though

[plaifender]

anyone else gonna chime in??......

I'm pretty sure this is a replica.. and if it is indeed a replica he should be shut down!!!!!!!

[Member X]

Did the WM9s all have the same serial number?

Although it's good for us to have individual serial numbers, it's also good for those passing them off as gens... (if this is the case here).

[ubiquitous]

Back in the day, the WM9's were essentially the same thing as the TW Best reps. Quite a lot has changed since then

[By-Tor]

Oh yeah that's definitely fake. Absolutely no doubt about it.

Rep dial

No rehaut thickness

Noob YM is actually better than this one... not to mention WM9 which would actually be pretty difficult to spot from the pictures. This one in the auction isn't a bad rep though... I believe it's a TW model.

[nakortheblue]

Hour markers lume looks raised. Date mag looks too small.

[plaifender]

report report report!

[deniz21]

im no expert, so i cant say fake or real.. but guys this watch got sold for 5500usd

[plaifender]

im no expert, so i cant say fake or real.. but guys this watch got sold for 5500usd

Sad isn't it?? I think someone got scammed..

[Omega]

Good find. It's a very bad copy...it even not deserve to be called "replica"...