watcher Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 I don't often do this but this watch just does not look right to me. It looks like a noob factiory or early WM9 'F' serial fake. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PRE-OWN-ROLEX-OYSTER-PERPETUAL-YACHTMASTER-16622-F-/180505992475?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Wristwatches&hash=item2a06fedd1b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plaifender Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 I don't often do this but this watch just does not look right to me. It looks like a noob factiory or early WM9 'F' serial fake. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PRE-OWN-ROLEX-OYSTER-PERPETUAL-YACHTMASTER-16622-F-/180505992475?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Wristwatches&hash=item2a06fedd1b The wm9 usually look better than this watch i think. The cyclops might be too far right. but it's too hard to tell with the angle of his shots since there is no direct shot of the dial. The biggest tell is probably the "yacht-master" on the dial should be a much darker red.... I'm no expert though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plaifender Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 anyone else gonna chime in??...... I'm pretty sure this is a replica.. and if it is indeed a replica he should be shut down!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member X Posted May 12, 2010 Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 Did the WM9s all have the same serial number? Although it's good for us to have individual serial numbers, it's also good for those passing them off as gens... (if this is the case here). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted May 12, 2010 Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 Back in the day, the WM9's were essentially the same thing as the TW Best reps. Quite a lot has changed since then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted May 12, 2010 Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 Oh yeah that's definitely fake. Absolutely no doubt about it. Rep dial No rehaut thickness Noob YM is actually better than this one... not to mention WM9 which would actually be pretty difficult to spot from the pictures. This one in the auction isn't a bad rep though... I believe it's a TW model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nakortheblue Posted May 12, 2010 Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 Hour markers lume looks raised. Date mag looks too small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plaifender Posted May 12, 2010 Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 report report report! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deniz21 Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 im no expert, so i cant say fake or real.. but guys this watch got sold for 5500usd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plaifender Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 im no expert, so i cant say fake or real.. but guys this watch got sold for 5500usd Sad isn't it?? I think someone got scammed.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Good find. It's a very bad copy...it even not deserve to be called "replica"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now