Tribal Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 CG's to short Bracelet wrong stamped 93250 Endlinks look bad Crystal wrong shape in every aspect So where are the improvements??? This is really a joke!!!!!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thogaa Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 Wouldn't the CG's be at least the same as on the first launch with wok rehaut? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefcook Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 It still is nothing then impertinent and dishonest to claim that his case set is 1:1. Neither crown position nor lug shape are anything near the genuine Sea-Dweller. The bracelet is just crap. Wrong markings, bad end link fitment, wrong end link shape. Any seller advertising this [censored] as 1:1 is more than just slightly shady. This is the worst rolex rep for years in my opinion! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
its_urabus Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 Sadly I'm with chef on this one. What a waste of everyones time. As for the 1:1 comment. I have spoken to a number of trusted dealers and 1:1 to them is not what we deem to be 1:1to mean. 1:1 to them means it's close to the same shape with close to the same markings. If it can take gen parts they will say it. There were a few Pams that were listed that way 1:1 with all parts interchangeable with the gen. I still don't believe it 100% though until I see it done here. This item is not 1:1 or made of parts that are instantly interchangeable with the gen. It's a cheap knock off that in my opinion is worse than the ssd of old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giobo Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 Lets say you can improve the crystal,end links,insert and crown( i doubt for all of these parts)...How in the heck are we going to enlarge the CG's??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
its_urabus Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 you dont... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
www_watch Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 With all the bashing going on I would like to say: At least they're working on it. I almost feared this model would be neglected by the factories in favor of all the innumerable Big Bang crap and 15ish obnoxious RO Offshore versions each week. Patience is part of the game. So let's wait and see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mapman57 Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 Latest rehaut angle looks better but still too deep? I miss my WM9 M Serial that never did arrive.............. Lets all await V3 :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 Specially for Rolex Reps, it's time to put the factories in the right direction. Like gen, 1:1, etc is not acceptable anymore. We have waste our time over years with bad replications. When I count the money only for Rep Subs I bought in the past I could buy easy a gen one So no money for crap anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.