thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Quick fix makes me worry 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paneraibob Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Just take a look at toros pics http://repgeek.com/showthread.php?t=161963 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Just take a look at toros pics http://repgeek.com/s...ad.php?t=161963 can you post them here ? thx Frank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paneraibob Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 can you post them here ? thx Frank SURE From his sales section from repgeek Rolex Sea Dweller 40mm, SS case, bracelet, sapphire glass, Superlumed $238 Asian ETA 2836 $308 Swiss ETA 2836 + shipment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) thanks !! no straight front shot can not see the rehaut could be a nice beater edit : Josh has pics up - rehaut looks good ! Edited January 23, 2012 by Star69 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z3k0 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 But, crown still sits too low on case, doesn't it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 thanks !! no straight front shot can not see the rehaut could be a nice beater edit : Josh has pics up - rehaut looks good ! I'd hit it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 But, crown still sits too low on case, doesn't it ? yes - litle too low - on Joshs pics it look better - i whould install a gen crown + better insert and shave the CGs ... i wait till i see some member pics - then i guess i have to order one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 yes - litle too low - on Joshs pics it look better - i whould install a gen crown + better insert and shave the CGs ... i wait till i see some member pics - then i guess i have to order one 100% agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 doubt this has a gen like bezel construction despite the description For shure not!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 For shure not!!! Does it matter if gen insert fits? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
its_urabus Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 A gen pearl is needed. I gen insert would be better as it is a different dimension than say the 16610. To buy I would need a wearable bracelet, that one sucks. Sel construction is weird. The crown position is low enough that it looks wrong. A gen crown would totally be needed. I was very excited when the said this was coming out and it was a 1:1 special project. In my eyes they failed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cib0rgman Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 I'd hit it if you compare this picture and the other ones, quality pictures clearly can see that is not he same watch, the rehaut looks woky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 if you compare this picture and the other ones, quality pictures clearly can see that is not he same watch, the rehaut looks woky I don't think the QC pics are updated yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke1973 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 I don't think the QC pics are updated yet I sure hope they update the old QC pics and it does look like the "new" watch..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted January 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 I have ordered one. If I get QC pics I'll post them. I already have a gen SD insert and crown and a bracelet with better SEL's so it will make a decent daily beater if nothing else! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Gen 2008 M for ref Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 QC pics are updated on Josh's site: http://imgur.com/a/tJd3J This is actually my watch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 what happened with the CGs ? MIA ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted January 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) WM9 SD pics! This is the gen they reckoned to buy to do the replication! The rehaut looks very good in QC pics. Bracelet aside this is a reasonable effort to be honest and very workable. Actually I have just looked at the pic and the CG's do look very stubby! I would ask for better pics to be sure! Edited January 23, 2012 by watcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 i hope the crown is ultrahuge - but i dont think the CGs can be fixed - they are way too short - it may work with an 5513 that "could" have been polished over and over - but for the SD ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted January 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 one other flaw I notice in QC pic is 93250 stamped on the bracelet end link. Should it not read 93160. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke1973 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Those CG's look way too short and stubby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ispytonyv Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 yeah shame about the CGs, because the rehaut really does look improved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted January 24, 2012 Report Share Posted January 24, 2012 what happened with the CGs ? MIA ? Yikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.