Pam 7mm Cyclops : ** Completed **

[HauteHippie]

Updates:

2/13/2007: The magnifiers are done and shipping out to me today.

Final specs:

Diameter: 6.9mm 6.75mm

Total Thickness: ~1.19mm 1.22mm (should (still) work on 95%+ of watches)

Magnification: 1.55X to 1.7X depending on rehaut (distance from date window)

Material: Sapphire

AR Coating: None.

RWG Pricing:

$25 USD each up to 2 pieces

$20 USD each for 3 or more pieces

+ a couple bucks for shipping and packaging per order

[Finepics]

Well I guess you have to count me in!!

[sssurfer]

Hi chieftang, I am interested in 6 pieces.

If you are going to get AR coating on some lenses, I would take 3 pieces AR coated and 3 naked.

[cskent69]

Count me in for 3. Thanks

[lovepanerai]

great effort

count me in for at least 6

[nelly]

Count me in for 2

[Watchmeister]

I am in. Count later.

[ajoesmith]

yes yes yes, you can count me in too, maybe for 2 or 3 or more

[Indyclmbr]

Would these work with the new 2893 gmt datewheels? If so, I may be in. Just trying to figure out how it would be better than the one I already have.

Climb on.

[watcher]

I will take 2 please.

[HauteHippie]

Would these work with the new 2893 gmt datewheels? If so, I may be in. Just trying to figure out how it would be better than the one I already have.

Climb on.

The main question is what is the diameter of the genuine cyclops for your watch? Generally for F,G,H, and I (?) series PAMs the cylopes are around 7mm in diameter (so this new one will be sized appropriately), while the older watches were smaller - 6mm or so.

So, for example, the 27a and 28a power reserve reps are better off with the watchmen 6mm cylops.

[shultz]

Just assembled one of the watchmen's 6mm cyclops to my 029. Although this is an "old" watch I guess the 7mm would look better on my 029.

Please count me in for 2 (two) 7mm pieces, okay?

Edited November 22, 2006 by shultz

[Chronus]

The PAM autos I have are 028, 029, and 063... would it be appropriate for these? I may be in on a couple anyway in case I go for other auto PAMs later on (eg. PAM194 if it's ever in titanium, or a 7750 GMT PAM).

[mikellem]

I am in for 1 pc.

Thank You!

[HauteHippie]

Thanks for the responses thus far. However I do have to commit to a 100 pc order, so I'm going to need to see a little more interest in this if the project is going to proceed.

[Watchmeister]

C'mon guys.

[lovepanerai]

OK I am going to up my commitment to 10 if that helps :-) c'mon guys can't hurt to have 1 or 2 extra for future purchases

[Bazz]

You can put me down for one

[HauteHippie]

lovepanerai, that does help. But at this time I haven't seen quite enough interest to proceed with the project. So, here's a shameless Monday bump.

[sssurfer]

C'mon folks, with all those new Submersibles, Arktos and so out there, paid way over 200 USD, I can't believe that so few people are interested in getting a step towards perfection at a mere 25-30 USD!

And a step that is not merely aesthetic, but actually enhances the way you enjoy your watch. Date readability is not trivial, isn't it?

[rsv123]

Put me down for one - prefer without A/R coating (if there's a choice).

[lovepanerai]

where are the perfectionists here c'mon people

[HauteHippie]

Final specs are being reviewed by the engineers... I really hope to see some more interest so this project can move forward. I know there are alot of Arktos and Submersibles out there that would look a whole lot better with a proper cyclops - so speak up people!!! Now is the time.

[Chicken Manny]

I would be up for 4, if not more.

[TK471]

I would be up for 4, if not more.

I am up for one for my 63 GMT without a doubt!!!