FxrAndy Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 vintage Omega seamaster 300!!!!!! Oh yes that would be great, do we get to correct it during the build to make sure it was 99.99 correct???????? How about an Omega XL Railmaster, this wood be great as there is NO good rep of the XL case size at all they are all to thick, would also open a new line of XL ATs that could be made!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docblackrock Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Rolex GMT 6542. PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm with you there pal. But then that would ruin the enjoyment of wha.....oops, said too much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryaku Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 (edited) IWC Gst 3537 in titanium (Pug won't agree as he already owns a Gst in Ti) http://www.dotcom-life.com/joyful-watch/ma...537-01-0001.jpg Edited November 30, 2006 by ryaku Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 The seahawk gets my vote. There are more than enough Rolex/IWC reps out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Wow this topics HOT 19 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users) 19 Members: fxrandy, Nanuq, crystalcranium, repaustria, subzero1, TTK, pollux1, sssurfer, rek001, blueclub, fredrik m, Sir-Lancelot, ryaku, RiverwindMDS, M5Man, Mark, savage_here, qwert750, poodang How about an affordable and acurate BOND SUB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollux1 Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 A top quality Tag heuer Monaco, plz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 What about a Glycine? Large nice watches, gen not very expensive, anyone could afford one. The extra large F104 (52mm!!): My favourite KMU48 (48mm): The more modern Lagunare (46 mm): Or, for tiny wrists, the Ningaloo Reef (40mm): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mystix Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 WE NEED MORE FORTIS'!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystalcranium Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 The seahawk gets my vote. There are more than enough Rolex/IWC reps out there I'll be willing to buy the genuine when they flip it and want to sell it!!!! (Just kidding. No reason to give the wife reason #27 for divorce) There are NO decent GP reps and this is very surprising. One of the oldest names, the driving force behind the development and feasability of tourbi movements in two different centuries and no one is reping them adequetely. What's their purchase limit? I think the SH in Stainless is about $4000-$5000. If money were no object.....a decent Swiss VC Regulator would be very desireable but I'm sure that's way out of range for a genuine to copy from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Tracy Posted November 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Let's keep in mind that we are limited to the following movements.. eta-2836/2824/2892/6497. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uziuzi Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 I am voting for this one. Finally it has to be done.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 I am voting for this one. Finally it has to be done.... Ah Hm did you read what movements are available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uziuzi Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Ah Hm did you read what movements are available? Really sorry bout this andy, i still need to learn a lot as a newbie.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TTK Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 (edited) Sea Hawk...is 44mm X 20.11mm THICK.....2x HRV......and comes in Titanium....Steel or YG / WG......from $7000 upwards....and kicks the ass of all others.....! Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....! Edited November 30, 2006 by TTK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Really sorry bout this andy, i still need to learn a lot as a newbie.... Welcome, this is the place to learn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkerouac Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 I'm surprised there has been no mention of JLC in this thread. Here are two candidates: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystalcranium Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Sea Hawk...is 44mm X 20.11mm THICK.....2x HRV......and comes in Titanium....Steel or YG / WG......from $7000 upwards....and kicks the ass of all others.....! Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....! Here's a link to steel on rubber $4200 http://www.essentialwatches.com/listing_de...mp;itemID=12032 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TTK Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 No complications....JLC's have ALARM functions....ETA dun do that....! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Sea Hawk...is 44mm X 20.11mm THICK.....2x HRV......and comes in Titanium....Steel or YG / WG......from $7000 upwards....and kicks the ass of all others.....! Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....Sea Hawk....! Whats the base movement on one of these Neil???? is it in house or based on another eta owned mark?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torresp Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 IWC aquatimer non-chrono (either in SS or Ti), just my 0,02€ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystalcranium Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Whats the base movement on one of these Neil???? is it in house or based on another eta owned mark?? In house GP Cal 33RO. Great link with history and terrific detailed pics http://www.p178host.com/gpgallery/seahawk_waffle/index.html Look at the date window!!!! That's gonna be a killer to rep! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gioarmani Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Speaking from a sales perspective, I think over the long term the greatest ROI one could possibly make from creating a new watch, would be the duplication of a Rolex. Simply put, more people have had & will have those over any other brand (i.e., everyones been through a Rolex at one point, but not everyone will necessarily own a Vacheron, IWC, U Nardin, etc.). If it were my money being invested in a new creation, I'd bet either an exact replica of the Sub, SD, or GMT would probably bring in the most money. And if it's a 1:1 match, most people will bypass every other dealer's model around--including the MBWs--to pay through the nose for something that even beginers can easily add gen parts to. Hell, it'd practically be a gen straight from the box, if it's done right. I know I'd buy one; and I bet 60% of the rest of the board would too eventually. I think that's where you'll get your biggest return on investment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAHLER Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 I vote for this watch... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uziuzi Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Not a bad idea indeed...and the "who has the best sub" question will be finally resolved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel Posted November 30, 2006 Report Share Posted November 30, 2006 Indeed, a 1:1 submariner or sea-dweller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now