Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Gen Sub Date Mag Inconsistencies


HauteHippie

Recommended Posts

Some of the older models did have bigger dates than the new, and it could also be the lens they're shot with. If you're shooting macro, you've probably got a wide angle which tends to expand & exaggerate angles that don't naturally appear, in order to "cram" more of the entire view (including the peripheral) into the shot, thus making the date-mag appear smaller. The opposite effect will happen if you were to shoot telephoto from a distance, and zoom in on the object to make it appear as if you were actually closer when taking the picture. The lens takes everything that would normally be in the frame and compacts it--"smashing" it together, if you will--making the images that are farther back appear larger than normal and the images closer to the camera appear slightly smaller than normal. Similar to the proverbial image we've seen ad nauseam of a "huge" sun/moon that appears to be sitting on the immediate horizon next to the animal in view; this technique is also a great way to make your girls appear thinner when shooting them. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am of the opinion that the last few serials have lower powered mags than before. For reps I would still error slightly on the large side.

Well the one with the large date mag in my pics is an F serial without lugholes. The smaller date mag is a P serial with lug holes. I've got a date magnifier that looks almost exactly like the P serial picture, and I'm going to have it installed on my TW Best classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The single digit dates always appear larger the the twenties. You see this when you look at the unmagnified date wheels. They're slightly larger because they can fill up the whole date window. The teens are also larger than the twenties because of the spacing. The one in the teens allows more room for the second digit and hence the overall date looks larger.

Last week we saw where rehaut was less on a 16800, which would also affect date mag, but on the 16610's, the best deal is going to be to compare the same dates and then as Goi says, you're probably goimg to have to take into account camera lens, etc

And of course, date mag on the 1680 is still greater than the 16610's because of the height of the crystal from the dial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The single digit dates always appear larger the the twenties. You see this when you look at the unmagnified date wheels. They're slightly larger because they can fill up the whole date window. The teens are also larger than the twenties because of the spacing. The one in the teens allows more room for the second digit and hence the overall date looks larger.

It's not the numerals I'm looking at... Just look at the white date window. On one watch it almost fills the magnifier, while on others there is alot more of the black dial visible in the magnifier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a slight variation from year to year. It's not unheard of for Rolex to mix things up from time to time. But I probably would go back to Gio's answer where variations in camera angles and lenses accounts for most of the differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a slight variation from year to year. It's not unheard of for Rolex to mix things up from time to time. But I probably would go back to Gio's answer where variations in camera angles and lenses accounts for most of the differences.

I wouldn't be terribly surprised either, except for the fact that two of the watches above which show the variation have the same serial (albeit produced in consecutive years). I'm not so sure I can chalk it up to lenses because wide angle lenses don't tend to exagerate things in the middle of the frame. In any event I think it's interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was at the official rolex dealer a couple of weeks ago. Although I’ve been there many times for servicing I never really paid much attention to the new ones as I was not in the market for one. Last time I did ask to see a new gmt and sure enough the mag is less powerful Id say 2.0 my 1680 and probably all plastic crystal watches are 2.5 if not a little more they fill the entire magnifier up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last two pics you've posted are more accurate for most of the gens I've seen or owned:

I think the too-big date window is a problem a lot of the reps have, trying to blindly follow the old wives tale that "the date window is supposed to completely fill the cyclops eye". But truth be told, sadly, the gens do vary slightly from piece to piece.

184157-6405.jpg

184157-6406.jpg

184157-6407.jpg

When it's ridiculously over-sized, it's just as much of a dead give-away as a ridiculously shallow rehaut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up