Rep or Gen

[508-Fanatic]

I'm wondering if the frog is back...

[tframo]

Kermit?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1

Beach hit the nail on the head

[Guest MoneyBags]

Lume surrounds too thick. Usual on Reps..Also Bezel paint to consistent in the light.White. A Gen's Bezel numbers will look grayer out of the light

Edited February 5, 2015 by MoneyBags

[POTR]

Thanks for coming back with a couple of speculations after a couple more irrelevant posts and studying up a little to almost sound like you know what you are talking about.

Enjoy the next reincarnation...

Karma lingers, eh?

[Legend]

Its a Rolex assumed fake first that's why one should buy a Gen Does not cost much to wear the real thing past the initial investment. It's like currency on your wrist. Always worth $1000-$1200 less than you paid. So its costing you three funky reps to wear the real thing and in five years when the new one goes up you can get even more of your money back.

The way I see it. If you have to ask , it's likely a fake. Most Rolexes in the wild are assumed fake. The most replicated watch ever.

BTW That is a REP in a few ways.

STFU, you of the one genuine submariner fame. What is it with you really? You gonna ride around the world on your Harley and that one genuine Rolex you own, preaching the evils of wearing reps? There is a word to describe guys like you. It's called "asshole" and it has your attitude all over it.

Go strut your stuff on the gen forums. Oh wait, what stuff?

Sent from Mars using tapatalk

[junbug5150]

Hoping he didn't pay Gen $$

[Me82]

Rep for sure

[POTR]

Really?

[sgtguk]

I'd have to say rep in this instance, bloody nice piece though 

[POTR]

Say it isn't so!