markiemark Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 I spotted this pic as I was looking at nato's. Could anyone tell me what model this is? I tried Google with all kinds of model numbers, but no match... Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 I'm not sure I'd call it a vintage but it's a 16800 from the look of things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markiemark Posted January 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 21 minutes ago, StormTooper4 said: I'm not sure I'd call it a vintage but it's a 16800 from the look of things Oh well, it certainly isn't modern. Thanks, so this is what I'm after then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 Its modern because of the crystal and therefore its depth rating but because of the dial you get that vintage vibe The Rolex Submariner 16800 generation also introduced a modern standard of water resistance to theSubmariner line. The case’s 300m (1,000ft) depth rating endures to the modern era, but the 16800 lays exclusive claim to “first 300m” status within the historic pantheon of Rolex milestones. This really is the best of both worlds; a vintage watch with modern-Rolex performance. Wear it, enjoy it, and don’t worry. This Rolex can still roll out. See it in high-resolution images on www.watchuwant.com. http://blog.watchuwant.com/rolex-submariner-16800-vintage-milestone-time-capsule-video-blog/ https://8past10.com/blog/180-the-rolex-submariner-ref-16800-the-best-value-vintage-rolex Here it started all.. Once you actually look at what the Ref. 16800 has to offer you'll see what Adam was talking about. It was the first Rolex Submariner to have the following : 300M water-resistance, sapphire crystal glass, quick-set date, high-beat movement and was the last Submariner date to have a matte dial. There is a reason this Submariner has most of the same features as it's modern contemporary, it was the one that started it all off! This transitional reference has the benefit of having all the pros of a modern Rolex but lacks those unsightly white gold surrounds that plague contemporary models. It's also a vintage watch that can actually be worn. I doubt that many people wearing a 5513 are going to risk taking it diving or even down the street for a coffee yet the sapphire crystal means that the 16800 will throw whatever you put it through right back at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugop Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 The 16800 is a great reference especially with the early style lume plots. Mine gets a ton of wear. Unfortunately it is a later model with the marker surrounds. Still it isc a lughole case with sapphire crystal and is able to retain a vintage feel to it. Especially in a world of ceramic inserts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sputim Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 Isn't this model supposed to have lug holes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbane883 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 Yup. Not a 16800. Unless it's a weird Franken Milsub version with fixed bars. Plus, the bezel is a 5513/1680 bezel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docthor Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 Probably just a bad phantasy rep Sent from my wooden drums via Tupperware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 I've never seen a milsub 16800, but that's what it looks like- 4 line dial appears to be matte dial with date, cyclops and sapphire crystal. Can't see the crown guards. And yes the bezel does look strange. Come to think of it, I've never seen a 1680 milsub either. But I like the yellow aged markers of the 16800s I'm just not going to put fixed bars on mine! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugop Posted January 19, 2016 Report Share Posted January 19, 2016 Isn't this model supposed to have lug holes? Yep... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markiemark Posted January 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2016 Argh, so it's a fantasy (rep)! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted January 20, 2016 Report Share Posted January 20, 2016 Duh! Good spot on the lugs. It looks like they've be welded in 5517 style Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolex5512 Posted January 22, 2016 Report Share Posted January 22, 2016 16800 is a great watch. A cheaper alternative to the 1680 especially good looking without the white gold surrounds. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phener9 Posted January 22, 2016 Report Share Posted January 22, 2016 I got myself a Noob V5 ceramic its ok but now I have seen this image, maybe the same watch but with this vintage leather strap. My question is where can I get a rep like this.http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Cinturino-Pelle-Bufalo-Vintage-ILLINOIS-20-mm-Watch-Strap-Band-Marrone-/191585853513?hash=item2c9b682049:g:TPAAAOSwpDdVX0F2 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted January 22, 2016 Report Share Posted January 22, 2016 That's the Rolex 5513- everyone has them- it'll look good with that strap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now