Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Rolex 1675 : Need Expert Infos..


Athaya

Recommended Posts

Hello guys,

 

Got an offer to make a deal with this 1675. Seller inform that all parts are gen.

 

I’m not very familiar with 1675, I hope can get advise if this oke is legit and good to go.

 

Things that I had check and I know that are gen : Crown, Insert, Movement, and case. One thing I’m not really sure is the dial and hands, wether dial is gen and hands are not service one.

 

Watch additional info :

- 2.9M serial

- MK1 dial (are this really a gen?)

 

992e0103b7f1aab3a32c8d69ec3712ff.jpg

728802824d67f77a6b4f5c773c9dbf53.jpg

42c2bb56e636b4055c11d194ebfd9513.jpg

5b3af99c1d72388d047a444f1ef62a9a.jpg

dfb99f57822c5af40d77e62bb24758b0.jpg

270ce913010b50f53207fb2ec0e0f70e.jpg

34129f16677a0f37b25121d1d70df9b4.jpg

aa24c56031a7489311fac7379baeee6e.jpg

7083d4a5750deeeeff2928f567dede9b.jpg

c7739dcc14ede8791f503aba3eb8e87e.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

b6e4d8c66fd1fed09719eb829a289b81.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, that dial is crap.  Compare with mine from 1962, note mine is the "radial" dial.

 

gmt2.jpg

 

I think the case is wrong too.  Compare with mine at top right:

 

thin_cases.jpg

 

My advice?  Run away from it.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Well they sure have done a massive job  on weathering the case but i’m with nanuq on this one. It’s too thick. A 62 could be even a bit thinner than a 2.9 serial but mine from 69 is still way thinner than this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always check the “E”s. Look how long the middle leg is and is it centered between the top and bottom legs... usually it’s not supposed to be. Usually.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

That's well-worn but legit 1675.  Dial is definitely a legit Mk.1 "Long E" dial used from '67 to '71.  I have a '67 GMT with same dial.  And here's a pic of a loose Long E I recently sold for $3.5k. The "O" may look weird but that's how they rolled in that era.

 

Case looks legit too.  How the insert fits in the bezel is my only question, but if it's real it's worth a ton.  That's a very fat font. 

 

How much did they want for it?

IMG_2905.jpeg

Edited by Virgil Hilts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's well-worn but legit 1675.  Dial is definitely a legit Mk.1 "Long E" dial used from '67 to '71.  I have a '67 GMT with same dial.  And here's a pic of a loose Long E I recently sold for $3.5k. The "O" may look weird but that's how they rolled in that era.
 
Case looks legit too.  How the insert fits in the bezel is my only question, but if it's real it's worth a ton.  That's a very fat font. 
 
How much did they want for it?
IMG_2905.thumb.jpeg.6ae68dac79e2b9b6c14ec2c7d2e38172.jpeg


Thx for the info, a nice point of view.

I know that the insert is original, but only worn bad on the bottom red part, it’s still able to be installed press on the bezel like how it should be.

Regarding the price, seller ask for $10K.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up