ajoesmith Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 as the title says, king has a B&R with swiss ETA 2892 is it for real?? would post the link but well you know EDIT, confirmed by Ruby with real swiss ETA 2892 movement!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadog13 Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 I doubt that is swiss eta 2892...more likely a rep with the famous asian copy movement, like other dealers have...just King didn't upgrade the info on her site because of not being so popular dealer as josh and trusty on the forums and selling more to the other part of the world and still manages to fool the buyers...just my way of thinking...but hey, i might be wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajoesmith Posted April 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 But they are new items on kings website and posted as SWISS 2892 & ASIAN 2892. Only in PVD and TT PVD with rubber strap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadog13 Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 But they are new items on kings website and posted as SWISS 2892 & ASIAN 2892. Only in PVD and TT PVD with rubber strap! then i might be wrong with my previous statement...If she says it swiss 2892, then it is!...interesting, now we could actually spende some more $$$...this is bad info for my bank account...already today made a deal on a 330$ PAM...do I need this too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadog13 Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 usually king has got a pic of the mvt of the watch...but not this time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajoesmith Posted April 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 Yeah i thought the same thing too, thats why ive emailed just to check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateveraddy Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 Are they ever going to come out with an accurate BR-03? This 46mm is just way too big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajoesmith Posted April 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 Well King has replied and said yes its eta 2892 movement. Ive asked for a movement picture, we shall see......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 I am betting it is Swiss. I still can't rationalize wearing that thing on my wrist though. You have to have a 10" wrist to wear a 46mm square. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottie333 Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 I am betting it is Swiss. I still can't rationalize wearing that thing on my wrist though. You have to have a 10" wrist to wear a 46mm square. No you don't! I have a 7 3/4 Inch wrist and it sits on it just fine!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Category 5 Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 I thought The Zigmeister said that a 2892 wouldn't even fit in this watch. Unless they are making a different case version I wouldn't be surprised to find this out as another ruse. I'd love to be wrong though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marrickvilleboy Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 @ Catergoy 5 I was under the impression that the original had ETA-2892. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronus Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 @ Catergoy 5 I was under the impression that the original had ETA-2892. If you mean trhe rep, it was using a very cheap asian movement even though the ads said ETA 2892, and then subsequently Asian ETA 2892. This movement does not even have a passing resemblance to an ETA 2892 or even the Seagull ST-18 (according to The Zigmeister). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marrickvilleboy Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 no I meant the genuine watch: I remember reading that it has an ETA-2892. So I dont see why it would not fit the replica case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronus Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 no I meant the genuine watch: I remember reading that it has an ETA-2892. So I dont see why it would not fit the replica case. Perhaps the replica watch case is not really 1:1, or perhaps it needs access from the back where the stamped "screws" are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eunomians Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 Well, it all makes no difference to me. 46mm is just plain too damn big. Bring on the Br03. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronus Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 Well, it all makes no difference to me. 46mm is just plain too damn big. Bring on the Br03. I think I'll join you on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cypher Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 Perhaps the replica watch case is not really 1:1, or perhaps it needs access from the back where the stamped "screws" are. I think the screws on the back are just for the strap lugs. You get a table attachment for the BR-01 and I think you'll need to remove the lugs for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajoesmith Posted April 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2007 Well well well apppaently its is available in real swiss ETA 2892 check out the reply from ruby: hi joe. i can get the watch. but there is two version, copy eta 2892 or real swiss 2892. thanks! ruby anyone goin to buy it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cypher Posted April 28, 2007 Report Share Posted April 28, 2007 (edited) Excellent! Do you know how much the swiss is going for? I've been looking to get it for a while, only with a better movement. Edited April 30, 2007 by cypher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vdubpower Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 why would ruby be confirming somethign abt kings watches???????????????/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajoesmith Posted April 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 She didnt, she also has it for sale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niko Posted April 30, 2007 Report Share Posted April 30, 2007 This is interesting news, as when it was discovered that the 'first batch' of the 1:1 copies did not have an ETA mechanism, The Zigmeister did in fact advise that the ETA would not actually fit in the case. If a new version was available, I would assume that Josh and Andrew had access to it also. N. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eunomians Posted April 30, 2007 Report Share Posted April 30, 2007 It's all useless for me unless there's a BR03. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pman Posted May 22, 2007 Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 Did anyone buy the 42mm? Please post pictures if you have the watch. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now