kasigi Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Signatures are getting bigger. Much bigger. I just spotted one that was over 480x640 and that's just plain wrong for a signature really. A signature is supposed to be something related to the person posting, not just a fullsized picture of a bikini clad woman. Nothing wrong with pictures of bikini clad women, I mean, I have plenty of them on my hard drive (fnarr fnarr). But not as signatures at that size. Any plans to have a limit on sig size? It's really starting to get incredibly untidy when reading posts. K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Funny you should ask that question; I'm actually working on a solution to this right now. Should be operational within a couple of hours or tomorrow, depending on when I decide to go to bed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwai02 Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 well...I hope my 600 x 218 can pass the test... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomBombadil Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Great work admin! On a side note, in the My Controls area, you can select to not see anyone's signatures. Personally I have them turned off because of this reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Great work Thomas! On a side note, in the My Controls area, you can select to not see anyone's signatures. Personally I have them turned off because of this reason. That is also true and a very good tip that I forgot to mention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BilboBaggins Posted May 13, 2006 Report Share Posted May 13, 2006 Yeh this is a good shout...can be a nightmare reading a thread when you have to keep scrolling past a pic you have seen countless time before. Jon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehtolcad Posted May 13, 2006 Report Share Posted May 13, 2006 also, adblock works wonders wink wink Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasigi Posted May 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2006 also, adblock works wonders wink wink That's what I've been using. I didn't want all sigs off through control panel but have used adblock on some of the more *ahem* huge *ahem* ones K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usil Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 I hope they are reduced in size. I hate seeing these things over and over and over and over... Usil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronus Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 I was wondering the same thing. I am one with a big signature, and no one has complained to me yet, although I think I am more critical of it myself! Are there any qualifiers that can be added to the img tags such as size as a percentage (%) or pixel size as in standard html? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwai02 Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Is this good enough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BilboBaggins Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 I was wondering the same thing. I am one with a big signature, and no one has complained to me yet, although I think I am more critical of it myself! Are there any qualifiers that can be added to the img tags such as size as a percentage (%) or pixel size as in standard html? Thanks. It's probably easier to edit it with Paint, where you can go to the "Image" menu...then "Stretch/Skew"...then you can set the height and width as a percentage of its original size. Jon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasigi Posted May 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Is this good enough? In my opinion, that's probably about three times as tall as it should be, maybe even four times. Chronus, I must have thought yours was too big, I've adblocked it! K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usil Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Were here to read messages and trade knowledge on reps NOT flood each page we load with huge meaningless pictures that waste time loading the page. It slows everything down and just gets in the way. Usil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasigi Posted May 16, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Agreed. My sig is pretty much the standard size of signatures on most boards I frequent and it's only 400x75 pixels so not large. K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usil Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 Feek, yours is ok. However, some are so bad I just quickly pass them by not even bothering to read their comments. Usil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fitmic Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 There's another aspect of this as well: There are people that pay by each GIGABYTE they download. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bAdhAirdAy Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 (edited) Nothing wrong with pictures of bikini clad women, I mean, I have plenty of them on my hard drive (fnarr fnarr). Is that what keeps your drive hard Edited May 17, 2006 by bAdhAirdAy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 done.. i have just see this topic and realised saruman was too big Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest overboosted Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Yes, But look at all these posts. There is so much clutter in the avatar blocks now......... <-------------------------- there is a hugh gap below all your signatures. I say sig should be no bigger than avatar block, then it takes up no more room than no sig at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasigi Posted May 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Avatars could be limited to something like 100x100 which would also tidy things up but they're not as bad as the sigs. The only real issue I have with avatars is the animated gifs which aren't really needed. K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lollipop Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 What's the new size limit? I tried to post a new sig but it's too big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 Placido Domingo says its ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 (edited) What's the new size limit? I tried to post a new sig but it's too big. Could it be the bigger the sig the more you want to compensate for something else? Edited June 20, 2006 by retep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bres3000 Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Yes, But look at all these posts. There is so much clutter in the avatar blocks now......... <-------------------------- there is a huge gap below all your signatures. I say sig should be no bigger than avatar block, then it takes up no more room than no sig at all. I'm surprised that no one has nailed you with this anal [censored], overboosted - your sig is so wide, it necessitates a horizontal scroll bar! Personally, I don't care unless you've got a page-long advertisement for a strap maker in your sig - that's too much! [sig withheld in honor of Topic] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.