Daytona pre 2004 16520

[rosnik]

I received this morning from PreciousTime.

Here some pictures for you guys.

Edited October 16, 2007 by rosnik

[Dizzy]

So thats all the info we get hey? lol

The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago.

Is this Asian or Valjoux?

This one is prob 100x more reliable than the new "time bomb" sec @6

LOnnie

[slickdick]

So thats all the info we get hey? lol

The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago.

Is this Asian or Valjoux?

This one is prob 100x more reliable than the new "time bomb" sec @6

LOnnie

I think it is a non-chrono asian automatic.

Edited September 24, 2007 by slickdick

[gioarmani]

Does the large second hand (stop-watch hand) always turn too?

[rosnik]

Sorry for the poor infos,

now I'll get for you:rolleyes:

The Chrono is foull functional, the seconds are @9 ,

The little dials are @3 and @9, aligned.

About the movements I think it's A7750 but I do not know exactly.

[slickdick]

Sorry for the poor infos,

now I'll get for you:rolleyes:

The Chrono is foull functional, the seconds are @9 ,

The little dials are @3 and @9, aligned.

About the movements I think it's A7750 but I do not know exactly.

It does looko like asain 7750, its the first pre-200x one i see with markers next to the subsdials.

[rosnik]

It does looko like asain 7750, its the first pre-200x one i see with markers next to the subsdials.

Yes,

it's 16520 .

[rosnik]

Do you think the bracelet is correct?

I'm thinking to get one folding first link type............

[rckh]

Sorry; Let hope u paid not more than USD$50 for this Daytona.

[rosnik]

It's really so bud?

Edited September 24, 2007 by rosnik

[giorgio]

Sorry; Let hope u paid not more than USD$50 for this Daytona.

Please tell us where you get 7750 chronographs for less than $50. I'm sure we'd all love to know.

[giorgio]

The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago.

I think the subdial spacing is the same as those old ones you refer to. Looks like they made the subdials smaller and the rings thicker so they could fit the markers in at 3 and 6. This also helps to make it look like they're closer together than they actually are, but they're still too far apart.

All in all, not a bad watch though, and you don't have to worry about a hacked movement grinding to a halt.

[Dizzy]

Now that i see the new batch of pics, you can really see the sub dial spacing... pretty far apart

Lonnie

I think the subdial spacing is the same as those old ones you refer to. Looks like they made the subdials smaller and the rings thicker so they could fit the markers in at 3 and 6. This also helps to make it look like they're closer together than they actually are, but they're still too far apart.

All in all, not a bad watch though, and you don't have to worry about a hacked movement grinding to a halt.

[jfreeman420]

If this is trying to be a zenith based daytona the hour markers are too fat and short. Should be long and skinny. The subdials are way off. I couldn't wear that, although I do have two second @ six paperweights right now.