Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Daytona pre 2004 16520


rosnik

Recommended Posts

So thats all the info we get hey? lol

The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago.

Is this Asian or Valjoux?

This one is prob 100x more reliable than the new "time bomb" sec @6

LOnnie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So thats all the info we get hey? lol

The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago.

Is this Asian or Valjoux?

This one is prob 100x more reliable than the new "time bomb" sec @6

LOnnie

I think it is a non-chrono asian automatic.

Edited by slickdick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the poor infos,

now I'll get for you:rolleyes:

The Chrono is foull functional, the seconds are @9 ,

The little dials are @3 and @9, aligned.

About the movements I think it's A7750 but I do not know exactly.

dscn3986kb1.jpg

dscn3984dz4.jpg

It does looko like asain 7750, its the first pre-200x one i see with markers next to the subsdials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago.

I think the subdial spacing is the same as those old ones you refer to. Looks like they made the subdials smaller and the rings thicker so they could fit the markers in at 3 and 6. This also helps to make it look like they're closer together than they actually are, but they're still too far apart.

All in all, not a bad watch though, and you don't have to worry about a hacked movement grinding to a halt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that i see the new batch of pics, you can really see the sub dial spacing... pretty far apart

Lonnie

I think the subdial spacing is the same as those old ones you refer to. Looks like they made the subdials smaller and the rings thicker so they could fit the markers in at 3 and 6. This also helps to make it look like they're closer together than they actually are, but they're still too far apart.

All in all, not a bad watch though, and you don't have to worry about a hacked movement grinding to a halt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up